<span>In pure competition, producers compete exclusively on the basis of p</span>roduct features.
Answer:
d. purchase the machine because each partner has one vote in management matters
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the partners vote whether or not to buy a new machine for $100 so the violet and William would agree on this but Xavier does not agree
Now according to this situation the machine should be purchased as each partner vote is necessary also there is a majority of 2 person to buy the machine
hence, the option d is correct
Explanation:
Is there a private detective that the venture capital company contracts? Does it investigate the start fraud? Answer 5 SHART Redux Time Reports REQUEST PLUS REQUID TIME REPORTS can be far from this growth list. Have you ever been online and offline? Later below the procedure for reporting such incidents. 1 Answer  Paul Cohn, I made that VC answered on August 4, 2015. Risk capital Working process is very complete and it will be difficult to detect any kind of fraud. VC sometimes helps diligent using an external company. In general, VCs do not adopt private detective, but often use a company that verifies the background verification. Some of the background control companies may exceed recording recording, but can do a private research work as necessary, but it does not happen frequently (it has never disappeared so much disappeared). The records are considering the following: Confirmation of training for education A pre-employment confirmation is to find legal issues that participate in personal credit issues and find false statements of the contractor / administration team. With regard to your education and employment history, it may be possible to see if you have other legal and credit problems, do not disclose. It is very unusual to find a "fraud", but it is possible to make sure that VC asks entrepreneurs questions, and at least the contractor can confirm that all the company's product events fully advertise that you can find it. After the investment.
Answer:
The answer is: Alais will prevail because of material breach of the contract
Explanation:
Material breach in contract law refers to one party failing to perform under the contract significantly enough so that the aggrieved party has the right to sue for breach of contract.
In this case when Rutherford failed to perform, Alais sustained enough "damage" that enables her to sue Rutherford. She probably was no longer able to finish her job in time.
The correct answer is FIFO meaning that the oldest inventory items are recorded as sold first but do not necessarily mean that the exact oldest physical object has been tracked and sold.
