<span>I would suggest treating the Indians in a more humane way. It's also probably better to let an Indian leader (who obeyed our colonists) rule the Indians, because the leader would know the people and better communicate with them. And the colonists could indirectly benefit instead of being in conflict with the Indians directly.</span>
Harriet Tubman was able to fight against the oppression of slavery by helping the enslaved people flee the South and advocated for abolition.
<h3>Who is Harriet Tubman?</h3>
He was a right activist that led numbers of slaves to freedom on the Underground Railroad in the line that cut inland through Delaware along the Choptank River.
Hence, he was able to fight against the oppression of slavery by helping the enslaved people flee the South and advocated for abolition.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about Harriet Tubman
<em>brainly.com/question/483928</em>
#SPJ1
Mutual fund because it does not have the high risk as a normal stock good luck :)
<em>Klicker</em>
Answer:
Choice : 1 or A : Many had left Indian Territory and were fighting in other states.
Choice : 2 or B : Union troops had threatened them with violence and they were afraid.
Choice 4 or D : Both choices had the potential of destroying the prosperity that had gained.
These I believe are the anwers you are seeking
Explanation:
Answer:
Option B is the right answer.
Explanation:
During the Civil war, the Women’ Suffrage movement was masked due to the war effort and abolition of slavery of Africans. Many conventions and lectures were held by the women activists but were not acknowledged.
After the war, women leaders raised their voice out of rage to claim the Enfranchisement right. The leaders gave final consent for the liberation of slaves but women were given little importance. This made them demonstrate their protest.
After years of Strife and struggle, under the president Woodrow Wilson, the constitution was amended and the final approval was given to women to cast their vote henceforth.