Answer:
Proposition of Fact
Explanation:
A proposition of fact is the argument that tries to convince the audience about a course of action which the argument maker desires everyone must accept. So in this scenario, Janet brings forward a solid argument which is supported by the accident outcome and this argument can be used to convince the audience.
Answer:
$81,750
Explanation:
The computation of the amount of total insurance is shown below:
= (Home mortgage loan + car loans + personal debts + credit card loans) ÷ 2 + estimated funeral cost
= ($120,000 + $10,000 + $14,000 + $7,500) ÷ 2 + $6,000
= $75,750 + $6,000
= $81,750
Under the DINK method, we simply half of the items except funeral cost
Answer:
The correct option is B.
Explanation:
Emergency managers and planners are professionals, who are experts in the art of analyzing problems, making appropriate decisions and taking necessary actions that will solve the problems on ground.
The decision making process usually begin before the occurrence of emergency, this is called the planning stage. At this stage, an organization usually make decisions about how it is going to react to certain emergency situations that might occur in the future.
An effective and deliberate planning prior to emergency will greatly enhance the ability of the organization to respond effectively during emergency situations. The number and the size of decisions and problems that need to be addressed during an emergency situation depend largely on the quality of the decisions that were made (or were not made) during the planning process.
Answer: B. Fundamental weighting.
Explanation:
A fundamentally weighted index refers to a type of equity index whereby the components that are chosen based on the fundamental criteria like the dividend rates, book value, revenue, dividend rates, etc.
Fundamental weighting is the index weighting which results in portfolio weights shifting away from securities that have increased in relative value toward securities that have fallen in relative value whenever the portfolio is rebalanced.
Answer: b). falls from a positive amount to another positive amount
Explanation: Given that diet coke and diet pepsi give the consumer equal level of satisfaction. Diet coke and diet pepsi are substitutes, since, the consumer does not care about consuming diet pepsi and diet coke. For substitute goods the consumer will buy the cheapest of the two. When pdc (price of diet coke) rises but it remains less than pdp(price of diet pepsi) then the consumption of dc will decrease but it will still be above the consumption of dp. Since it is still relatively less expensive than diet pepsi. So the consumer will buy diet coke than diet pepsi, which means consumption of diet coke, dc falls from one positive amount to another positive amount.
