Answer: The correct answer is YES it is admissible as evidence of the plumber's fault.
Explanation: An Evidence has probative value if it tends to prove an issue. The testimony of the homeowner of the regarding the plumber's response is a party admission. It is admissible as a hearsay exemption under Rule 801(d)(2)(A) which explains that a statement or statemens made by a party in a case cannot be excluded as hearsay when offered against him by the opponent. As such, the statement is a probative evidence.
Answer:
$3,400,000
Explanation:
The computation of the credit sales is shown below:
As we know that
Closing balance of accounts receivables = Opening balance of accounts receivables + Credit Sales - Bad debts written off - Cash collected from credit customers
$750,000 = $550,000 + credit sales - $460,000 - $4,060,000
$750,000 = $4,150,000 + credit sales
So, the credit sales is
= $4,150,000 - $750,000
= $3,400,000
Simply we applied the above formula
Answer:
The cost of the work transferred-out during May is $18,630
Explanation:
For computing the cost of work transferred, first we have to compute the conversion cost per unit and material cost per unit
The conversion cost per uni = Conversion cost ÷ (transferred units + work in progress)
= $11,160 ÷ (2,700 + 300 × 30%)
= $11,160 ÷ (2,700 + 90)
= $11,160 ÷ 2,790
= $4 per unit
Now, material cost per unit = Material cost ÷ (transferred units + work in progress)
= $8,700 ÷ (2,700+300)
= $8700 ÷ 3,000
= $2.9 per unit
So, total cost of the work transferred is equals to
= Transferred units × conversion cost per unit + transferred units × material cost per unit
= 2,700 × $4 + 2,700 × $2.9
= $10,800 + $7,830
= $18,630
Hence, the cost of the work transferred-out during May is $18,630
Answer:
The month of April
Explanation:
Susan Zupan, a lawyer, accepts a legal engagement in March, performs the work in April, and is paid in May. If Zupan's law firm prepares monthly financial statements, the law firm should recognize the revenue in April because according to revenue recognition principle, revenue should be recognized in the accounting period in which services are performed, and Susan zupan performed the work in April so therefore the firm should recognize the revenue in April.
I would go with C because you need to hear the other person
