1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OlgaM077 [116]
3 years ago
15

Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu. (please select one of the options in parentheses, each possible answer has "

around it)
The article "The Melting Arctic" attempts to win over public opinion by making use of persuasive techniques. One such technique is the use of ( "Emotional appeals", "Bandwagon", "Scientific data", "Bias"), which relies on proofs, graphs, and charts. The article also relies on ("Expert opinion", "Association", "Celebrities", "Emotional appeals"), which involves the endorsement of an idea or opinion by a renowned professional in that particular field.

**Second Part**

In contrast, the NOAA video uses visuals of animals to appeal to the viewer’s ("Logic", "Emotions", "Ethics", "Reason"). It makes ("ILL-informed", "Frivolous", "Passionate", "illogical") claims about the worsening Arctic conditions and the adverse effects they have on animal life.
English
2 answers:
Elanso [62]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answers are the following:

the article tries to win over public opinion by using SCIENTIFIC DATA, since these is the technique that relies on proof, graphs, and charts.

The other technique which involves the endorsement of an idea or opinion by a renowned professional in a particular field is EXPERT OPINION.

The NOAA video uses visuals of animals to appeal to the viewer's EMOTIONS. While the article uses scientific data that impli objectivity, logic or reason, the use of animals is meant as an emotional technique, appealing to the viewer's feelings. By doing this, the video is making PASSIONATE claims about the worsening Arctic conditions. Instead of appealing to scientific data and facts, it appeals to the emotions of the viewers.

LuckyWell [14K]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer from each drop-down menu are the following ones:

The article "The Melting Arctic" attempst to win over public opinion by making use of persuasive techniques. One such technique is the use of <u>scientific data ,</u> which relies on proofs, graphs, and charts. The article also relies on <u>expert opinion,</u> which involves the endorsement of an idea or opinion by a renowned professional in that particular field.

In contrast, the NOAA video uses visuals of animals to appeal to the viewer's <u>emotions.</u> It makes <u>passionate</u> claims about the worsening Arctic conditions and the adverse effects they have on animal life.

The linking word "in contrast" indicates that what is about to be introduced should be the opposite to whas has been said. Consequently, as the first paragraph talks about scientific data, the second one should appeal to the opposite of that, that is, emotions and beliefs. "Passionate" is the only adjective in the examples that has a positive connotation that can be put together with the first option ("emotions").

You might be interested in
Parenthetical documentation refers to?
Komok [63]

Answer:

Parenthetical documentation refers to citing sources in parentheses at the end of the evidence.

Explanation:

Parenthetical documentation is used to simplify the way a reader can locate the reference for the information within an essay or any kind of written work, this way the writer doesn't have to add endnotes or a references list or page at the end, this information is located at the end of the citation as mention before between parenthesis.

4 0
3 years ago
What is the “inevitable hour” that the rich and ambitious share with their forefathers?
taurus [48]
The moment of death is my answer.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does an objective focus on?<br><br> Teachers<br><br> Material<br><br> Families<br><br> Students
Sphinxa [80]

Answer:

Material

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Write comperative study between narinder and ranjit
Darya [45]

To write the comparative study between Narinder and Ranjit, you have to:

  • Identify the distinct characteristics of the individuals and compare the similarities and differences.

<h3>What is a Comparative study?</h3>

A comparative study is an analysis of two individuals that is aimed at understanding the similarities and differences between the persons.

Before a writer sets out to write a comparative study, he or she must understand the personalities of the persons whom he writes about. Only then can the writer be able to make accurate comparisons.

In the case of Narinder and Ranjit above, the writer should read the text to know how the individuals compare and write these in plain terms.

Learn more about comparative studies here:

brainly.com/question/14315928

#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
A participial phrase functions in a sentence as an _____
igomit [66]

Answer:

VERB

Explanation:

A participial phrase would appear to be a verb but it functions as an adjective in a sentence. It describes a noun. It consists of a present participle, past participle, or any modifiers and objects.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does keying a sentence mean?
    15·1 answer
  • What type of relationship involves people who don’t share the same status
    11·1 answer
  • How does the author of passage 2 use rhetorical devices
    13·2 answers
  • Please help me please please please please please please please please please
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following would provide the best supporting evidence of an author's sarcasm?
    11·2 answers
  • Why must Odysseus go to the Underworld (Hades) after his stay in Circe’s island, and whom does he meet while there?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a directional word you might find in a recipe?
    5·1 answer
  • Tumble and fall.<br> Hear the call?
    7·2 answers
  • Guys tell me about a time when you were treated differently and how you felt<br> Please help!
    7·2 answers
  • John Brooke did his duty manfully for a year, got wounded, was sent home, and not allowed to return. He received no stars or bar
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!