Roosevelt corollary is the answer!!!
(got it from online) <span>The aim of the crusades was to take over the so called Holy Lands. Much of the ambition was to just loot the place instead of saving it. Sometimes there was a success and the crusaders held it but it was never held for very long. They did hold Jerusalem for over 75 years at one time. But that is just a drop in the time line for the Mideast. Eventually, the Crusaders were kicked out. Last, we still feel the effects of this effort. Many of the Islamic nations still remember it as if it was yesterday and they are not fond of those memories. Hence a successful failure.</span>
Answer:
Pacifism
Explanation:
As Eric Hobsbawm explained in <em>The Age of Extremes</em>, World War I happened when the European Empires were crumbling and falling into pieces. Liberal theorists opposed to war as a means of Empires to gain power over others. The economic costs clearly disfavored war but there were also the ethical and moral aspects that gained momentum prior to WW I. These aspects materialised again in the 70s (Vietnam war) when more people started to protest against the human costs of war.
Loyalist: Tea overboard!!!
Patriot: Rebel rousing: Boston Tea party
Erie Canal was built as a result of De Witt Clinton's plan to connect rivers.
