Answer:
This discussion is an example of the second step of the ABCD model which is the "BALANCE RESOURCES" step.
Explanation:
The ABCD model of risk management consists of the following four steps to reducing risk;
a) Assess the situation
b) Balance Resources
c) Communicate
d) Do and Debrief
In this case, there is an ongoing discussion on how to get back to the barracks as safely as possible.
Options are suggested which include taking a taxi, walking or getting a designated driver from the club. This is the second step of the model where resources are balanced and possible options are suggested and weighed to prevent and expose errors.
my weaknesses is a be good to your classmeat and and help your taecher if he need a help and be helpful student .
Answer:
Yes and no in a way the Constitution kinda ensured there rights as people. But did not directly state it that what when the bill of rights came to play. And if the continues the confederal government we would have an anarchy because the government would collapsed decades ago. Yes some might have could have took it over and not people might not have there rights.
Explanation:
He was a United States Senator from Hawaii from 1963 to 2012. He was a member of the Democratic Party, and he was President pro tempore of the United States Senate (third in line in the Presidential Line of Succession) from 2010 until his death in 2012, making him the highest-ranking Asian American politician in U.S. history. Inouye also served as chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations.
Answer:
A. It is likely that she would win on the claim because she does not seek to use the photographs in a business pursuit.
Explanation:
In fair use act, <em><u>which is the copying of any given copyrighted material done for a limited purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize e.t.c,</u></em> the major aim is to prevent the copying of the materilas for financial gains. Such copying can be done without permission from the copyright owner.
She could likely win based on this argument as a result of her trying to copy only few copies of the pictures from the original pictures without any aim of monetizing her copies.
<em>Since it is going to be done for limited purpose, she is within her right of fair use if she decided to go ahead without the photographer's permisssion.</em>
