Answer:
I don't know what came over me. After weeks of seeing her be put on a pedestal for the most mundane of tasks, and knowing I was pushed off to the side, a form of jealousy ran over me. Through my veins and soul, like a forest-fire that wiped out anything and everything. I was both the fire, and the forest in that moment. There was no blood-shed, just a bit of yelling. I'd change it if I could, I'd change everything if I had that power.
If I were to give my past self a bit of advice, know that it's not her fault. It's nobody's fault, but with actions come consequences. Throughout this little writing assignment, I've come to the realization that sometimes things happen. Sometimes your rose-colored glasses over your own judgement shatter all along the floor in tiny shards.
Who's to blame? It depends what you mean. For my own emotions? Nobody, absolutely nobody is to blame for that. For what happened? Myself. That's okay, though. The fire in my soul has died down into ash and dust, and the forest-fire is long-gone.
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is a little more complicated than that because the people who work for them have been working hard
Answer and Explanation:
The main literary elements used by these two writers are figures of speech. Figures of speech are elements that seek to stylize the text, making it more beautiful, deeper and highlighting concepts within it. These figures of speech reinforce the communication that the text presents, and making the text more appreciable.
Regarding the use of figures of speech in the works of Stephen Crane and Ambrose Bierce, we can say that they differ in the effect they present in the text and in the form of communication that they transmit to the reader. Ambrose Bierce, uses figures of speech that present sounds or harmony, causing rhythms in reading. These figures of speech are used in a very objective way and promote a more gothic, poetic and melodramatic communication.
Stephen Crane, on the other hand, often uses figures of speech that present thoughts, making constant use of simile and irony, where he makes explicit comparisons between two elements in a critical, accusing and often joking way.