Answer:
The Giver ends with Jonas’s rejection of his community’s ideal of Sameness. He decides to rescue Gabriel and escape the community, and they grow steadily weaker as they travel through an unfamiliar wintery landscape. At the top of a hill, Jonas finds a sled and rides it down toward a community with lit windows and music. Lowry does not confirm whether the two survive, because the reader can either interpret the sled as a hallucination of Jonas’s dying mind, or as a fortunate coincidence. Upon first seeing the top of the hill, Jonas believes that he remembers the place, and it is “a memory of his own,” as opposed to one from the Giver. Because Jonas doesn’t have his own memories of snow, the meaning of this sentence is not obvious. This confusion could signify Jonas’s deterioration. However, Jonas may also recognize that the hill and sled signify the presence of a community that allows for sleds and snow. Jonas calls his destination “Elsewhere,” an ambiguous term because the community uses it both to refer to places outside the community and the destination of people who have been “released,” or euthanized. Additionally, the reader cannot take the lights Jonas sees in the windows at face value. Light symbolizes hope, but people also often talk about seeing light right before death.
Explanation:
does that work or do u need more
It should be noted that the rhetorical strategies that were used by Quindlen include anaphora and antimetabole.
<h3>
What is a rhetorical strategy?</h3>
Your information is incomplete. Therefore, an overview will be given. A rhetorical strategy simply means the literary device that can be used to convey a particular meaning in a literary work.
It should be noted that Quindlen typically uses anaphora and antimetabole. This is used in creating parallelism in the speech.
This helped in creating a flow to the speech and then brings the piece together as a whole.
Learn more about rhetorical questions on:
brainly.com/question/13734134
When considering two part f devices in this poem, this would then be the following:
How much this person would appreciate thee.
And why she would appreciate thee.
I wanted to discuss the first one.
"How much this person would appreciate thee.".
She would appreciate this thee very much as when see said in the poem,
"<span>I love thee with a love I seemed to lose
With my lost saints. I love thee with the breath,
Smiles, tears, of all my life; and, if God choose,
I shall but love thee better after death."
This would show and support to why she would have respect and appreciation for thee.
Now when considering the second device, we can see why she would love this thee.
We can see based on the following:
</span>"<span>How do I love thee? Let me count the ways.
I love thee to the depth and breadth and height
My soul can reach, when feeling out of sight
For the ends of being and ideal grace.
I love thee to the level of every day's 5".
This would then show why she would love the thee.
And based on all of this, the relation to this would be the fact that this person would love thee, and why she would, and how she would love it until the day of her/his death.</span>
Answer:
Hi. The answer to this is a bit complex so you can find it under the explanation
Explanation:
Everyone acts differently; some people face many emotional, physical, and mental problems during adolescence, and others do not experience these things.
They engaged in welfare capitalism to encourage employees to socialize.
