1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex Ar [27]
3 years ago
13

What was one point of the appeal of the death penalty for the Rosenbergs?

History
1 answer:
hram777 [196]3 years ago
5 0
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be that </span><span>"Their crime </span><span>did not directly cause any deaths", since although it was clear both Rosenbergs were guilty of espionage, it's not certain that their deeds led directly to any personal harm</span>
You might be interested in
In two or three sentences, compare the two Harriets. Identify one way in which they were similar and one way in which they were
GarryVolchara [31]
<span>Harriet Jacobs and Frederick Douglass both managed to escape slavery. Jacobs was hesitant to write or publish her account, however Douglass was not and published several versions of her story.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
National Security: the colonized island country has deepwater ports for refueling the mother country's navy and merchant marine.
kolbaska11 [484]

Answer:

Imperialism is never justified.

Explanation:

In the question above we see that there is a country that has deep water ports and an airfield. These two factors are elements that generate wealth for that country and that belongs to the national territory. In this case, it is not justified that another country, out of greed, uses its influence and strength to dominate these elements through imperialism, exploiting foreign wealth for its own growth, while the country that owns that wealth is devalued.

6 0
3 years ago
After his debates Lincoln became known as
pochemuha

Answer:

What is often overlooked is that the debates were part of a larger campaign, that they were designed to achieve certain immediate political objectives, and that they reflected the characteristics of mid-nineteenth-century political rhetoric. Douglas, a member of Congress since 1843 and a nationally prominent spokesman for the Democratic party, was seeking reelection to a third term in the U.S. Senate, and Lincoln was running for Douglas’s Senate seat as a Republican. Because of Douglas’s political stature, the campaign attracted national attention. Its outcome, it was thought, would determine the ability of the Democratic party to maintain unity in the face of the divisive sectional and slavery issues, and some were convinced it would determine the viability of the Union itself. “The battle of the Union is to be fought in Illinois,” a Washington paper declared.

Lincoln opened the campaign on an ominous note, warning that the agitation over slavery would not cease until a crisis had been passed that resulted either in the extension of slavery to all the territories and states or in its ultimate extinction. “A house divided against itself cannot stand,” he declared. Lincoln’s forecast was a statement of what would be known as the irrepressible conflict doctrine. The threat of slavery expansion, he believed, came not from the slaveholding South but from Douglas’s popular sovereignty position–allowing the territories to decide for themselves whether they wished to have slavery. Furthermore, Lincoln charged Douglas with conspiring to extend slavery to the free states as well as the territories, a false accusation that Douglas tried vainly to ignore. Fundamental to Lincoln’s argument was his conviction that slavery must be dealt with as a moral wrong. It violated the statement in the Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal, and it ran counter to the intentions of the Founding Fathers. The “real issue” in his contest with Douglas, Lincoln insisted, was the issue of right and wrong, and he charged that his opponent was trying to uphold a wrong. Only the power of the federal government, as exercised by Congress, could ultimately extinguish slavery. At the same time, Lincoln assured southerners that he had no intention of interfering with slavery in the states where it existed and assured northerners that he was opposed to the political and social equality of the races, points on which he and Douglas agreed.

Douglas rejected Lincoln’s notion of an irrepressible conflict and disagreed with his analysis of the intentions of the Founding Fathers, pointing out that many of them were slaveholders who believed that each community should decide the question for itself. A devoted Jacksonian, he insisted that power should reside at the local level and should reflect the wishes of the people. He was convinced, however, that slavery would be effectively restricted for economic, geographic, and demographic reasons and that the territories, if allowed to decide, would choose to be free. In an important statement at Freeport, he held that the people could keep slavery out of their territories, in spite of the Dred Scott decision, simply by withholding the protection of the local law. Douglas was disturbed by Lincoln’s effort to resolve a controversial moral question by political means, warning that it could lead to civil war. Finally, Douglas placed his disagreement with Lincoln on the level of republican ideology, arguing that the contest was between consolidation and confederation, or as he put it, “one consolidated empire” as proposed by Lincoln versus a “confederacy of sovereign and equal states” as he proposed.

On election day, the voters of Illinois chose members of the state legislature who in turn reelected Douglas to the Senate in January 1859. Although Lincoln lost, the Republicans received more popular votes than the Democrats, signaling an important shift in the political character of the state. Moreover, Lincoln had gained a reputation throughout the North. He was invited to campaign for Republican candidates in other states and was now mentioned as a candidate for the presidency. In winning, Douglas further alienated the Buchanan administration and the South, was soon to be stripped of his power in the Senate, and contributed to the division of the Democratic party.

DONT PUT ALL OF THIS JUST READ THOUE IT AND YOU WILL KNOW WHAT IS WAS KNOWN FOR! PLS MAKE MY BRAINLYEST PLS

8 0
2 years ago
Enslaved Africans might have been considered seasoned if _____.
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

C. they had survived in the Americas for a few years

5 0
3 years ago
Which best describes the origins and spread of the bubonic plague in the 14th century?
lord [1]

The right answer is the third one: the bubonic plague originated in the Gobi Desert, part of the then Mongol Empire, around 1320. It then propagated to China and subsequently to India, Europe and Russia. The disease spread via trade routes mainly as a result of a poor hygiene. It never reached the American continent or Sub-Saharan Africa.      

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What were the Vietnamese nationalist sole purpose
    5·1 answer
  • What´s the meaning of Ok?
    10·1 answer
  • Which c ame first, muhammad preaching to the makkans, or his night journey?
    10·1 answer
  • Explain the feet made by the army Sorgen one
    6·1 answer
  • After the French and Indian War, there was a great deal of tension between the
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Define Divine Right.
    5·1 answer
  • Which side of the Revolutionary War had the following strengths and
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following events could cause the movement shown in the graph?
    10·1 answer
  • What is Anti-Semitism, and how did it affect Jewish people before 1933 and after? Did Anti-Semitism play a role in the Holocaust
    9·1 answer
  • Please no fakes!!<br> ill give brainliest!
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!