If you are talking about President Ronald Reagan, he claims they sought to minimize the size of government.
The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
ANSWER: Malaria
afflicted the early immigrant settlers was a dangerous threat to life. Some of the diseases were new and treatments were ineffective. Malaria was deadly to many new arrivals, especially in the Southern colonies. Of newly arrived able-bodied young men, over one-fourth of the Anglican missionaries died within five years of their arrival in the Carolinas.
Imperialism: a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force.
"the struggle against imperialism"
HISTORICAL
rule by an emperor.
EXAMPLE: ENGLAND TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE USA.
Answer:
jhonson didn't want it because he was from the south and enforcing this act would take away there rights of slavery
Explanation:
hope it's helps you...
