This could either be the Northwest Ordinance, Oregon Trail, or the Louisiana Purchase...
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, guaranteed "equal protection of the laws" to all citizens, including former slaves, and granted citizenship to anyone born or naturalized in the country.
<h3><u>The 14th Amendment is what?</u></h3>
One of the Reconstruction Amendments, the Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868. It addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law, and it was proposed in response to problems involving former slaves after the American Civil War.
It is frequently regarded as one of the most significant amendments. The states of the defeated Confederacy, which were compelled to ratify the amendment in order to regain representation in Congress, fiercely opposed it.
The amendment, and especially its first section, is one of the most contentious parts of the Constitution, serving as the foundation for important Supreme Court rulings on issues like racial segregation in schools in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), abortion in Roe v. Wade (1973) (which will be overturned in 2022), the 2000 presidential election in Bush v. Gore (2000), and same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015).
Learn more about the 14th Amendment with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/12683660
#SPJ13
The answer is true because the mainland governor of Spanish Lousiana helped gain some easy conquest
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
They are not dismissing that there could be Jesus and Moses, this leads me to believe that they do have some level of respect for other religions, if they can "respect" one.
After examining Jackson’s accomplishments compared to his shortcomings and controversies, it can be difficult to be unbiased when deciding if he should or should not be replaced on the bill. Many historians and scholars are in disagreement with each other on the topic. Some believe he should be featured on the back of the bill and not the front George Washington, the first president of the United States, appears on the $1 bill and was also a slaveholder like Jackson. Around 300 slaves lived at Mount Vernon when George Washington died. He also supported legislation upholding slavery and also opposed other legislation on slavery. He signed the fugitive slave act guaranteed a right for a slaveholder to recover an escaped slave. He also signed the Northwest Ordinance that recognized the Northwest territory and outlawed slavery within the territory. He never publicly denounced slavery as an institution, and there is no discussion of removing him from the $1 bill.
When taking a closer look at the behaviors of both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, we can see that they share similarities with Jackson. If removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill is considered then so should removing Washington and Jefferson. However, Jackson is far too controversial, especially in recent years. He would be in the right spot if he was moved to the back of the bill, and someone like Harriet Tubman replaced him in the front. His accomplishments earn him his place on the bill, but his controversial actions lessen what he has earned which is why he should appear on the back. Especially compared to President Abraham Lincoln, who is featured on the $5 bill, Jackson should be featured on the back of the bill. Lincoln who had some of the greatest presidential accomplishments, like the passing of the 13th Amendment and the Emancipation Proclamation