Answer:
Explanation:
1)
Dr Cash $30,000
Cr Common Stock $30,000
2) No Entry
3)
Dr Office Furniture $3,800
Cr Accounts Payable $3,800
6)
Dr Accounts receivables $10,800
Cr Service Revenue (Commission) $10,800
10)
Dr Cash $140
Cr Service Revenue (Commission) $140
27)
Dr Accounts Payable $700
Cr Cash $700
30)
Dr Salary Expense $3,000
Cr Cash $3,000
Answer:
the beta be for the other stock in your portfolio is 1.73
Explanation:
The computation of the beta be for the other stock in your portfolio is shown below:
Given that
risk free asset contains the beta of 0
And,
market beta = 1
Now
1 = 1 ÷ 3 × 0 + 1 ÷ 3 × 1.27 + 1 ÷ 3 × beta
The beta of other stock = 1.73
hence, the beta be for the other stock in your portfolio is 1.73
Here we assume that one-third should be invested in all 3 things each
Answer:
Income statements and or Cash flow statements.
Explanation:
Income statement and Cash flow statements are required.
Income Statement will give us insight about our costs as we maybe recording sales but if the costs and expenses are too high we are unlikely to be making enough gross profits to be able to pay bills.
Cash flow statements are required as sales may be credit and thus reducing working capital for the company, although they may be making profits but if the debts are uncollected they are unlikely to have cash available to be able to make payments.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
Explanation:
Productivity per unput dollar=Fees charged from clients/total cost to firm
There are 3 options:
1. Using current software:
Av time=40 min
Researcher's cost=$2 a min
Total cost=40*2=80
Productivity per dollar input=Fees charged from clients/total cost to firm= 400/80=$5
2.
Using company A's software
Av time=30min
Cost of reducing av time=$3.5
Researcher's cost=$2
Total =30*2+3.5=63.50
Productivity per dollar input=400/63.5=6.3
3.
Using company B's software
Av time = 28 min
Cost of reducing av time=$3.6
Researcher's cost=$2
Total cost=28*2+3.6=59.6
Productivity per dollar input=400/59.6=$6.71
Answer - Using company B's software
Answer:
Differences in Operating Incomes Under Absorption Costing and Variable Costing:
The 2020 operating income under absorption costing is greater than the operating income under variable costing because
the ending inventory has carried over some fixed manufacturing costs, making the cost of goods sold less than under variable costing.
Explanation:
The differences in the operating incomes obtained under variable costing and absorption costing are due to the fixed manufacturing costs that are included in the ending inventory and carried forward to the next accounting period while the ending inventory under variable costing does not include any fixed manufacturing costs. Absorption costing is based on full costing system but, variable costing does not include the full costs.
