Answer: Patriotism
Explanation:
Patriotism is known to be a show of allegiance to a state or religion which shows in an individual’s behaviour. Furthermore, it is a feeling which makes an individual to go all out for their country or religion with great pride and without any show of shame. Thus, patriotism can be shown to a state by obeying the national anthem and national pledge when it is been recited and so on.
Answer:
c. possible to test for equality of three or more population proportions
Explanation:
The answer is ---
c. possible to test for equality of three or more population proportions.
When ever there is a three or more than three populations, then it is possible to test for the equality for three or more than three population proportions using a chi-square tests.
A chi-square test can be used to determine the equality of population proportion for three or more than three populations. It is very versatile and an expand theory.
Hence the answer is
c. possible to test for equality of three or more population proportions.
Answer:
<u><em>Denver International Airport</em></u>
Explanation:
At 54 square miles, Denver International Airport is the biggest airport by land area in North America. It’s second in size only to the world’s largest airport, Saudi Arabia’s King Fahd International Airport. Nicknamed DIA, Denver's airport is also double the size of the second-largest airport in the U.S., Dallas-Fort Worth. DIA is home to North America’s longest public-use runway, which stretches over three miles in length. With nonstop service to 215 destinations, DIA sees an average of 61.4 million passengers per year.
Hope this Helps!! :) (can you mark me brainliest?)
The correct answer is c.: it served as the be boundary between North Korea and South Korea. The current line is in a similar place, but it's not a straight line, unlike the line running along the 39th parallel.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
