The main difference however between the modern US Constitution and the New York Constitution of 1777 is that while the US Constitution allows for various powers to the legislative branch, the New York Constitution tend to restrict legislative powers.
<h3>What are the similarities between the modern US Constitution and the New York Constitution of 1777?</h3>
These include:
- Freedom of worship,
- religious liberty,
- freedom of speech,
- the right to assembly
The New York Bill of Rights contains some key elements of the United States Constitution and this shows the individual rights and liberties which shows the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution.
Read more about US Constitution here:
brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ1
Answer:
A system where each branch of government shares powers with the other branches to limit their actions.
Explanation:
Ex. The executive branch (President) may veto a law passed by Congress, however the legislative branch can override it with a minimum of a 2/3 vote form both the House and the Senate.
Ex. The executive branch can appoint people to federal positions, however the Senate must "Advise and Consent" meaning they must confirm the appointment
Ex. The judicial branch can declare laws unconstitutional, however the legislative branch can hold a vote to overrule it.
Ex. The executive branch can declare executive orders, however the judicial branch can declare acts unconstitutional.
It’s B. You make a goal that you would work to achieve before the year ends.
<span>It cannot be guaranteed that the history of United States
would have been any different if the original thirteen states had been
guaranteed a perpetual majority of the representation in Congress. Probably the
revolution could have been delayed, but the revolution definitely would have
happened. At that time the colonists always were angry whenever something did
not happen as per their expectation. The colonists always had a tendency of
asking more than they had and this would only have been possible if the
colonists had their own country. </span>
Answer: It means A counter revolutionary or an anti-revolutionary is anyone who opposes a revolution, particularly one who acts after a revolution in order to try to overturn it or reverse its course, in full or in part.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
Have a good night ma'am/sir.
Be safe!
