Answer:
Nadia Arumugam will completely agree with this cartoon because she clearly stated that 'no one is completely banned from taking unlimited amounts of soda since they are not restricted from ordering two or more bottles of soda if they so desire'.
Explanation:
In the cartoon the picture of a man drinking a giant-sized soda before the ban, was compared to him after the ban buying two cans of soda. There was clearly no difference between the two because the objective of the ban which was to reduce obesity was defeated. The man remained obese.
This is in line with Nadia's argument that the ban does not prevent anyone from drinking an unlimited amount of soda since they could simply buy two or more cans if they so desire.
A, he really emphasizes his point by repeating that same phrase several times in his speech and uses that to get it across to the people listening
The correct answer would be... A, irony. It would go right with this sentence,It looked like a good thing but wait till I tell you
Answer:
Walking at the speed of light (,) so that I would not be late.
2. On the morning of my driving test,
3. When my mother married my father,
Explanation:
Answer:
because McCandless decided to leave the bush, but found that he could not safely cross the swollen Teklanika River due to the summer snowmelt from the glaciers.
Explanation:
I hope I helped you
