<span>#1) How are “Sonnet 55” and “Love Is Not All” similar and different?
Answer: The similarities in both of them is the use of alliteration and imagery. This can be seen in “Sonnet 55”, for example “wasteful war.” and in “Love is Not All”, “pain, past, power, and peace”. Also the form are similar. Love is not all is mentioned as Shakespearean sonnet. A difference between these is the theme. “Sonnet 55” talks about immortality and memory while “Love is not all important” talks about the irony of how love is not everything but it’s not unimportant.
I hope it helps, Regards.<span>
</span></span>
Answer:
Explanation:
1: ever
2: (i dont know sorry )
3: long
4: since ... im pretty sure
5: and.... i think
6: but
7: yourself
8:( im not sure)
9: sorry i dont know
10: with
Answer:
Odysseus is on a long journey.
Odysseus is the leader of his crew.
Odysseus is helped by a supernatural power.
Explanation:
Odysseus bares the responsabiliza of leading men in a dangerous journey with the guidance of the gods. Those are certainly the premise of a hero. A hero doesn't always have to be strong, but they have to have that something that makes them different and important in the story. Being the leader is certainly that quality since he also had many warriors. Being guided by the gods through the seas in certainly a characteristic of an epic heroic adventure.
Abolitionists used powerful speeches and presentations to engage people and persuade them to join the abolitionists’ cause.
They used real testimonials from people who had seen the suffering of slaves, they tried to approach people by making them aware of the situation that was being lived at that time.
A lot of people joined the cause, they stopped consuming sugar that slaves grew and started buying sugar made by the freemen. The inhabitants of Bristol also turned against slavery, despite being a port city.
All these attitudes were promoted by the speeches and presentations of abolitionists.
The answer is: The evidence is relevant but not sufficient.
The evidence is relevant enough to getting into an argument/ debate, and to question the claim, but it's not sufficient to win the claim. The claim is an statement in this case.
