Answer:
sales revenue. We are going to debit profit and loss too for cost of labor if need arises.
Answer:
$2,800
Explanation:
The computation of the increase in consumption is shown below:
= Marginal propensity to consume × rise in income
= 0.70 × $4,000
= $2,800
Hence, the consumption would be increased by $2,800
We simply applied the above formula i.e. marginal propensity to consume is multiplied with the rise in income so that the correct answer could come
Answer:
Extended decision making
Explanation:
Extended decision making is the decision making which involve the very high level of the purchase, an internal as well as extensive information search which is followed by the complex computation of the alternatives available and thorough evaluation is taken place when the purchase will take place.
So, for most of the people, when the decision of purchase is to be made like for the Ford automobile, the people will choose the extended decision making as it is expensive, infrequently purchased products.
Answer:
The marginal cost of producing the 25th speedboat is 18,575.
Explanation:
Note that the given Leisure Enterprise’s total cost (TC) of producing speedboats is correctly stated as follows:
TC = 10Q^3 - 4Q^2 + 25^Q + 500 …….………….. (1)
Where Q represents the quantity of speedboats produced.
To obtain the marginal cost (MC) of producing speedboats, equation (1) is differentiated with respect to Q as follows:
MC = dTC/dQ = 30Q^2 - 8Q + 25 ………………… (2)
Finding the marginal cost (MC) of producing the 25th speedboat implies that Q = 25.
Substituting Q = 25 into equation (2), we have:
MC = (30 * 25^2) - (8 * 25) + 25 = 18,575
Therefore, the marginal cost of producing the 25th speedboat is 18,575.
Answer:
competitor-oriented pricing
Explanation:
competitor-oriented pricing is a technique for valuing in which a producer's value is resolved more by the cost of a comparable item sold by an incredible contender than by contemplation of purchaser request and cost of generation; likewise alluded to as Competition-Based Pricing.
For instance: a firm needs to value another espresso producer. The company's rivals sell it at $25, and the organization thinks about that the best cost for the new espresso producer is $25. It chooses to set this very cost without anyone else item.