Answer:
This is effort justification
Explanation:
Kristen is justifying the effort of going to the Superbowl. She is saying she had a good time even though her team lost and the game was boring.
Answer:
This question lacks answers
A. currency swap.
B. arbitrage.
C. backwardation.
D. straddle.
<u>The answer is </u><u>b.</u>
Explanation:
Arbitrage is a common practice used to gain profits from inefficient markets. Since most financial markets are inefficient by nature, dealers and similar business entities that have an interest in this kind of business practice.
The profit in arbitrage is based on the <u>imbalance in the two prices</u> on each market respectively. The term is mainly used for financial markets and various financial instruments (securities, bonds, currencies).
In the example above, the dealer becomes an arbitrageur by making a profit from the difference in the yen/dollar exchange rate in two markets (NY and London.)
Answer and Explanation:
Given:
μ = 75 million
SD = 17 million
Probability (x) raw data = 110 million
Computation:
= Probability (x) < 110 million
= Probability [(x-μ) / SD] < [(110 - 75) / 17]
[(x-μ) / SD] = Z
= Probability [z] < [(35) / 17]
= Probability [z] < [2.05882353]
Using z calculator:
P-value from Z-Table:
Z score = 0.98024
Therefore, probability is 0.98024
Answer: Environmental partnerships.
Explanation:
It is important to understand that for most and all business to thrive there have to be an enabling environment for that to happen. Environment play a key or major role to the growth of any business and as such most business pay keen attention to their environment and do every means to ensure it is vulnerable for them to operate well. The partnership between organizations and seeking a operational environment to do their business is known as environmental partnership.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Richard De George is known for his work in business ethics. He discussed the conditions to permit whistle-blowing.
According to De George, whistle-blowing is permitted as moral authority when these 3 conditions are met:
1) The harm that will be done by the product [or company action] to the public is severe and considerable.
2) The engineer has told their superiors about their concern
3) The engineer has not received a satisfactory answer from their supervisors and also from other superiors and he is left with no other alternatives.
According to De George, whistle-blowing is mandatory as moral duty when these 2 additional conditions are met:
4) The engineer must have documented evidence that would convince a reasonable observer that his or her view is correct
5) There must be strong evidence that making the information public will in fact prevent the threaten serious harm.
