Answer and Explanation:
- Consumer as well as government overall expenditure seems to be a significant determinant of economic growth during a market. Unless the overall spending increases, the demand changes positively.
- Hence, just before the total individual and corporate expenditure in something like a firm increases, it demonstrates that perhaps the country's affairs cycle is going to expand, and then when total expenditure drops significantly, it illustrates that the financial sector's business period is going via compression.
So that it is the right answer.
Answer:
A larger industrial and service sector, and a larger number of people working outside of agriculture, can indicate a higher level of industrialization in the economy and vice versa. This means that the size of industrial service and the sector of agriculture employment rate indicates the level of industrialization because if the agriculture employment is higher than the industrial service it means that the country is not fully developed yet and therefore the level of industrialization is lower. But if the industrial service is higher than the agriculture employment that suggests or indicates that the country is developing or developed. For example in the United States the size of the industrial/service sector is much larger than it's agricultural employment and therefore this should suggest that country is much more industrialized or developed and the United States is. In comparison you take a developing country such as Chad and you can see that the agricultural employment is higher than the size of the industrial/service sector and in relation to this you can see that Chad must have a lower level of industrialization and in fact it does.
Explanation:
Answer:
1. $70
2. $106.42
Explanation:
(1) Variable manufacturing cost per unit:
= Direct labor + Direct material + Variable overhead
= $10 + $34 + $26
= $70
(2) Full cost per unit:
= Direct labor + Direct material + Variable overhead + Variable selling cost + (Fixed ÷ 1,200)
= $10 + $34 + $26 + $5 + [(19,500 + 18,200) ÷ 1,200)]
= $75 + $31.42
= $106.42
Answer:
3,300 deer
Explanation:
Total funds available to meet the entire cost of capturing stray deer = $48,000
This represents the total funds available as the Bruno & Court is a non profit organisation, it needs funding and as provided in the given case total funds available are $48,000 through local philanthropy.
Associated fixed cost in this activity = $15,000
Thus, maximum variable cost shall be = $48,000 - $15,000
= $33,000
Variable cost per deer = $10
Total number of deer to be captured = $33,000/$10 = 3,300 deer