how were the policies of massive retaliation and brinkmanship different from previous military policies?

2 answers:

4 0

Previous military policies had created massive killings throughout long years on a war of aggression. Brinkmanship, as showed in history was used to let another country stop its war through massive retaliation. It is a more dangerous option to use nuclear weapons as a sign of power and capability to kill more people including civilians in a fast mode.

sammy [17]3 years ago

3 0

The answer to <span>How were the policies of massive retaliation and brinkmanship different from previous military policies? is that</span>
<span>-Nuclear weapons
-Eisenhower used brinkmanship (nearly going to the point of war to scare enemy)
-no President has never been so "bravely stupid"</span>

You might be interested in

Why was the Tet Offensive considered a turning point in the Vietnam War?

madam [21]

The correct answer here is the option D.

Tet offensive was a major offensive undertook by the Viet Cong along with the North Vietnamese People's Army of Vietnam and it showed the shocked South Vietnam and its American allies that the war was actually far from over. This also led to the loss of the support for the war in the States.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was the name that the writers of the Federalist Papers wrote under?

Sophie [7]

That is A good luck with the rest of ur homework!!!

8 0

3 years ago

Which statement most accurately describes how geography affected the growth of the ancient civilizations of Egypt and Mesopotami

Oksanka [162]

C hope this helps :)

5 0