1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sindrei [870]
3 years ago
7

How would president Lyndon Johnson Be able to justify the use of federal troops to manage riots during the summer of 1967

Social Studies
2 answers:
Maru [420]3 years ago
7 0

The 1967 Detroit riot, also known as the 12th Street riot or the 1967 Detroit rebellion, was one of 159 race riots that swept cities in the United States during the "Long Hot Summer of 1967". This riot was a violent public disorder that turned into a civil disturbance in Detroit, Michigan. It began in the early morning hours of Sunday July 23, 1967. The precipitating event was a police raid of an unlicensed, after-hours bar then known as a <span>blind pig,</span> just north of the corner of 12th Street (today Rosa Parks Boulevard) and Virginia Park Avenue, on the city's Near West Side. Police confrontations with patrons and observers on the street evolved into one of the deadliest and most destructive riots in the history of the United States, lasting five days and surpassing the violence and property destruction of Detroit's 1943 race riot just 24 years earlier.

To help end the disturbance, Governor George W. Romney ordered the Michigan Army National Guard into Detroit, and President Lyndon B. Johnson sent in both the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions. The result was 43 dead, 1,189 injured, over 7,200 arrests, and more than 2,000 buildings destroyed. The scale of the riot was surpassed in the United States only by the 1863 New York City draft riots during the American Civil War,[2] and the 1992 Los Angeles riots. The riot was prominently featured in the news media, with live television coverage, extensive newspaper reporting, and extensive stories in Time and Life magazines. The staff of the Detroit Free Press won the 1968 Pulitzer Prize for general local reporting for its coverage.

Yuliya22 [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

President Lyndon Johnson could justify the use of federal troops by saying that this was necessary to maintain the safety of the population and the city.

Explanation:

In 1967, the tulmultos began when a police strike happened in an illegal bar at the corner of 12 streets and Claremont. There was a welcome party at two Vietnamese combatants. The regulars were all arrested, including 82 blacks . Residents of the area began a protest against the action, which quickly evolved into break-breaking, looting and fire. The problem escalated: the police responded with more force, but the residents continued the confrontation. The tumult spread to other neighborhoods.

These riots created a wave of violence and criminal acts, many public works and shops were plundered, many citizens feared to leave their homes and those who left were injured.

President Lyndon Johnson could have used this discriminated violence and the danger to the lives of citizens and the city as a justification for the use of federal troops to contain the riots.

You might be interested in
Suppose there is a policy debate over imposing trade restrictions on imported semiconductors in the United States. A political p
jolli1 [7]

Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.

Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.

This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.

The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why have some criticized utilitarianism on the basis that it is the ‘morality of swine’? How does Mill address this objection?
Elodia [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

As a theory, utilitarianism is usually thought to start with Jeremy Bentham, however, similar ideas were evident in the writings of David Hume in An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (1)and Francis Hutchinson, whom David Hume studied under, in his An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue (2). Utilitarianism tells us an act is moral insofar as it creates the greatest good for the greatest number. It tells us to take the amount of happiness distributed between sentient beings and look at which distribution is going to maximise the amount of happiness. It gives a systematic answer. Throughout the past two centuries utilitarianism has been very influential within practical disciplines of politics and economics. As a result, utilitarianism has had an influence modern life, particularly public policy. What could be more important when making political deliberations than aiming to make people’s lives better and less unhappy?

One of the first utilitarian theorisers, Jeremy Bentham, is famously credited for being the founder of the doctrine. Bentham defined utility as “instrumental to happiness”. He believes that all judgements of good and bad can be based on pleasure and pain. He is seen as an advocate of psychological hedonism. In his famous introduction of An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1979), Bentham states “Nature has placed man under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure.” Therefore, pain and pleasure provide the basis for his moral theory of ‘what we ought to do’. Initially, he began his career by studying law and then moved on to moral ethics in order to advise legislators. He was primarily interested in improving the law and his goal for the legislator was the utilitarian principle or the greatest happiness principle. Therefore, his advice was not initially aimed for individuals and their life choices but for the legislator. Although Bentham sees pleasure as the key of explaining how human beings act, he relies more often on the concept of pain when constructing his legal theory. While he does endorse act-utilitarianism, his ‘sanction-based’ theory of obligation is more applicable to the legal system he was so interested in improving.

John Stuart Mill is also one of the most well-known utilitarian thinkers and defenders of the theory. His celebrated thoughts can be found in his famous essay: Utilitarianism. Mill observes something of a crisis in moral thinking. Philosophical thinkers have been unable to come to a consensus on the principle of what constitutes right and wrong. Mill argues that having such a foundation is necessary to legitimise morality. This is why the theory of utilitarianism is so important.

Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill categorise and measure utility and pleasure in different ways. Bentham uses the hedonic calculus which decides the value of pleasure by seven measures of quantity: duration, intensity, certainty or uncertainty, remoteness or propinquity, fecundity, extent and purity. Bentham is well-known for his treating of all pleasures as of equal value. By this he means not that all pleasures are of exactly equal, but that the legislator who his work on utilitarianism is aimed at should not be valuing one pleasure above another.

John Stuart Mil’s idea of higher and lower pleasures has been viewed as flawed in itself. It has been criticised as a self-serving idea. For example, an intellectual will view his preferred enjoyments as a higher, more important pleasure. Therefore, as an intellectual, it could be argued that Mill himself is biased towards what constitutes as higher and lower pleasures.

6 0
2 years ago
Where did the Oregon trail begin and where did it end
babunello [35]
The Oregon trail begin in Missouri and ended in Oregon
7 0
3 years ago
What case gave the u.s. supreme court the power of judicial review
yuradex [85]
Was a landmark United States supreme court case in which the court formed in the basis for the exercise of judicial review in the United States Under article #3 of the consitution
4 0
3 years ago
Which materials are included in the hydrosphere there are not in liquid form
Wittaler [7]
Glaciers and Polar ice caps<span />
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • During the 1930's a join act of appeasement by the british and french was
    10·1 answer
  • Economies must answer the three economic questions because resources are
    5·1 answer
  • What were the benefits and consequences of president Jefferson’s decision to buy New Orleans and the resulting Louisiana Purchas
    7·1 answer
  • Which Han dynasty invention made books possible?
    12·1 answer
  • Difference between buddhism and zen
    11·1 answer
  • A group of people with similar backgrounds, wealth, and way of living. Ranking of people within a society.
    15·1 answer
  • John pinches Audrey so hard because
    10·1 answer
  • Eddie paid an $8 restaurant check with a $10 bill. The waitress gave him $12 back. The most ethical action for Eddie is to:
    6·1 answer
  • Sharawood is a village that has not yet been industrialized. Most residents of
    13·1 answer
  • Historically, the United States has always had a two-party system. Explain what a two-party system is and include at least three
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!