Answer:
Well it depends on your beliefs. I was taught that all people should have health care but you have to remember in order to do this the money will come out of taxes which means you as a citizen are going to have to pay more money.
Explanation:
Answer:obama administration is calledd
Explanation:
The correct option is (c); Yes, because the court took all well-pleaded facts in the complaint as true and resolved all doubts and inferences in the defendant's favor.
<h3>What is third-part defendant?</h3>
A third-party defendant is a person or entity that the primary defendant sues and adds to the case under the theory that they are accountable to the defendant for all or part of the plaintiff's claim.
For the given case:
- The court must accept as true all of the well-pleaded facts in the complaint and resolve any questions and inferences in the complainant's favor before deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. The complainant in this case is the defendant.
- Answer option A is erroneous because the third-party defendant's move was a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief can be given, not a petition to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Furthermore, not withstanding the lack of diversity of citizenship, the court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the defendant's contribution complaint since it is based on federal law, even though it may raise the question of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on its own.
- B is the incorrect response option. The court may only take into account the claims in the complaint, any exhibits attached to the complaint, and any matters susceptible to judicial notice when deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. (Remember that for a request for summary judgment, the court could take into account outside information like an affidavit.)
- Because any party against whom a claim is made may file a motion to dismiss for failure to articulate a claim upon which relief can be given, answer choice D is wrong.
To know more about jurisdiction and its types, here
brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
Answer:
A. Right-of-way should be given to the flow of traffic.
Explanation:
Right of way which is the right given to people that are on the road in-order to make use of the road before others are part of the rules and regulations guiding road usage.<em> In the case of the scenario given above, the Right-of-way should be given to the flow of traffic. That is why most buses re-entering the traffic needs to wait till there was minimal traffic before re-entering those traffic.</em>
Answer:
by a threat of a veto two ways i dont know i found this try it hope it helps
Explanation:
The President, however, can influence and shape legislation by a threat of a veto. By threatening a veto, the President can persuade legislators to alter the content of the bill to be more acceptable to the President. Congress can override a veto by passing the act by a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate.
