Answer:
1-a scientific theory is an in-depth explanation of the observed phenomenon. A law is a statement about an observed phenomenon or a unifying concept.
2-substantiated, explanatory, predictive, and testable
3-It is a misconception that theories turn into laws with enough research
Explanation:
Answer:
The legal school of thought illustrated in this dialogue is:
Law and economics school of thought.
Explanation:
The law and economics school of thought postulates that economic analyses, theories, and methods should be brought to the practice and interpretation of laws. This means that the tools of economic reasoning are the best tools for justified and consistent legal practices. This school of thought is significantly one of the dominant theories of jurisprudence.
Answer:
Neither. I DONT LIKE ANY OF THEM
Explanation:
Answer:
Federal court.
Explanation:
From the question, we can see that the competitor of the company -- ABC Inc. is the plaintiff that sues its competitor for trademark infringement. ABC inc. has the right to sue its competitor in both state courts and federal court. ABC Inc. can sue the competitor in the state court if the violations of the registered trademark is only done in one state but if it is more than one states, the it will be be the case of a federal court. Furthermore, the trademark was registered Federally, ABC Inc. are definitely going to sue in a federal court.
Answer:yes you can still be charged but usually the court will have more sympathy since you returned the item but you will have a less harder punishment associated with conviction if convicted
Explanation:
