Answer: Option B, a linear relation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's analyze the points in the data:
the first 3 pairs are: (0,14.70) (10,19.03) and (20, 23.36)
We can see the differences between consecutive points and see if the relation is linear:
(10,19.03) - (0,14.70) = ( 10 - 0, 19.03 - 14.70) = (10, 4.33) now we need to see the quotient: 4.33/10 = 0.433
(20, 23.36) - (10,19.03) = (20 - 10, 23.36 - 19.03) = (10, 4.33), and the quotient is the same as before.
This means that the relation is a linear relation, where the slope os 0.433 and the x-intercept is 14.70, so the equation can be written as:
y(x) = 0.433*x + 14.70
40/100 - (I may be wrong)
Explanation: 40% of 110 is 44 so we make this a fraction 44/110 and then simplify to get 2/5 and after that we know that 2/5 is also 40/100, meaning 40 out of 100 students like video games.
Answer:
542.6
Step-by-step explanation:
Converse of the alternate interior angles theorem states the postulate or theorem that proves that x is parallel to y.
Answer:
Here's a quick sketch of how to calculate the distance from a point P=(x1,y1,z1)
P
=
(
x
1
,
y
1
,
z
1
)
to a plane determined by normal vector N=(A,B,C)
N
=
(
A
,
B
,
C
)
and point Q=(x0,y0,z0)
Q
=
(
x
0
,
y
0
,
z
0
)
. The equation for the plane determined by N
N
and Q
Q
is A(x−x0)+B(y−y0)+C(z−z0)=0
A
(
x
−
x
0
)
+
B
(
y
−
y
0
)
+
C
(
z
−
z
0
)
=
0
, which we could write as Ax+By+Cz+D=0
A
x
+
B
y
+
C
z
+
D
=
0
, where D=−Ax0−By0−Cz0
D
=
−
A
x
0
−
B
y
0
−
C
z
0
.
This applet demonstrates the setup of the problem and the method we will use to derive a formula for the distance from the plane to the point P
P
.
Step-by-step explanation:
