I assumed you typo 821 by $21 per unit, then the answer will be
1- financial disadvantage of accepting the special order is loss of $60,000
2- a minimum selling price for these units should be $14.00
Explanation:
Loss of $60,000 = 15,000 x (14,000 – (5.1+3.8+1+4.2+1.5+2.4))
a minimum selling price for these units is $14.00 per unit because it’s the price the company can earn if accept a special order, though lower than cost of producing and selling at $18.00
The estimated cost of the assurance-warranty is $350. The accounting for warranty will include a credit to Unearned Warranty Revenue, $900
Explanation:
- Entertainment Tonight, Inc. manufactures and sells stereo systems that include an assurance-type warranty for the first 90 days. Entertainment Tonight also offers an optional extended coverage plan under which it will repair or replace any defective part for 2 years beyond the expiration of the assurance-type warranty. The total transaction price for the sale of the stereo system and the extended warranty is $3,000. The standalone price of each is $2,300 and $900, respectively. The estimated cost of the assurance-warranty is $350. The accounting for warranty will include a credit to Unearned Warranty Revenue, $900.
- Unearned extended warranty revenue is given to be as an unearned revenues in accrued liabilities in the balance sheets.
- Revenue which comes from separately priced, self-insured service contracts is reffered at the point of sale.
- Unearned revenue is a money which is received from a customer for work that has not been performed still.
A. A<span>n individual who pretends to be a customer to help a company test its offerings a detailed description of a typical, but fictional customer</span>
From the described case in the question, it is clear that Frank believes in doctrine called at-will employment or employment at-will.
At-will employment is a <u>U.S term used for a condition where an employee can be fired at anytime and without any warning as long as the reason isn’t illegal by law</u>.
This type of doctrine is no longer the main doctrine used in most U.S states by the 20th century, but it was commonplace during the late 19th century.
Answer:
Causal ambiguity
Explanation:
Causal Ambiguity is a situation is which it is impossible to replicate the consequences or effects of an event or thing or phenomena.
This is mostly used in the development of share prices among other things.
In the case of the question, the inability to relate the relationship between culpability and the firm's competitve advantage is why its ideas can not be imitated by any other firm.
Cheers.
