For the answer to the question above, millions of peasants came into the towns or worked in rural factories and mines. In the last half-century of the old regime, the Empire's urban population grew from 7 to 28 million people. Factory conditions were terrible. T<span>he worker 'raised on the frugal habits of rural life' was 'much more easily satisfied' than his counterpart in Europe or North America, so that 'low wages appeared as a fortunate gift to Russian enterprise'. </span><span>Shopfloors were crammed with dangerous machinery. There were frequent accidents. Yet most workers were denied a legal right to insurance and, if they lost an eye or limb, could expect no more than a few roubles' compensation.</span>
When we did the intervention we also set ourselves up for disaster due to putting a border on Mexico making it more attractive to come illegally thru America and we deport alot of them what's hypocritical about that is if we had not put a border and not Intervened into Mexicos business, America and Mexico would have hashed out a proper plan and have made the legal idea of moving to America the only reason to go there.
The correct option is George Washington.
George Washington was one of the founding fathers of America, and served as America's first president.
He was also a military leader, and used guerrilla warfare to fight the British during the American Revolution. For instance, he used guerrilla warfare during the Forage War.
