1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
EastWind [94]
3 years ago
15

Find the complex conjugate of the given number -1+4i

Mathematics
1 answer:
adell [148]3 years ago
3 0
With every imaginary term, there are 2 complex conjugates with opposing signs. So if I had the term a+bi, the complex conjugate would be a-bi. So given your example of -1+4i, the complex conjugate would just be the opposite sign, now negative, to get -1-4i.
You might be interested in
Solve the equation<br> 12 + 4m = 24<br> A)m=9<br> B)m=8<br> C)m=3<br> D)m=-6
pantera1 [17]
12 +4m = 24

4m = 12

m = 12/4

m = 3  so choice C. is right sure 
8 0
3 years ago
A store sold $115.50 worth of coffee mugs how many mugs did the sell ?
viktelen [127]
Not enough information to actually do the problem, please provide more.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
QUESTION ON PIC !THX
Aliun [14]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The original price was 43 dollars

The new price is 55/100 * 43

The new price is 2365/100

The new price is 23.65 dollars

2365 came from multiplying 43 * 55 which is 2365

4 0
2 years ago
A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an
Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

                                                                            Predicted value

                           Active value                 Fraudulent       Non-fraudulent

                              Fraudlent                         30                       58

                          non-fraudulent                   32                     920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of \left( {b + c} \right)(b+c) and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, 30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040

The error rate is,

\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}  

The percentage is 0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and \left( {a + b} \right)(a+b) .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}  

The percentage is, 0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and \left( {c + d} \right)(c+d) .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}

The percentage is, 0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64

6 0
3 years ago
Help???????????????????????????????????????????????????
julsineya [31]

Answer:

First option is the correct choice.

Step-by-step explanation:

y - Q = 3(x - P)

3P - Q = 3x - y

Best Regards!

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • P/4=12 what the answer to this
    9·2 answers
  • What is the reference angle for -150 degrees
    12·1 answer
  • Need some help please
    12·2 answers
  • (9,-9)
    8·2 answers
  • A two-factor study with 3 levels of factor A and 3 levels of factor B uses a separate sample of 10 participants in each treatmen
    11·1 answer
  • There are 0.95 Liters in a quart how many liters are there in a gallon
    10·2 answers
  • What is the slope of the line for (9,6) &amp; (-2,17)
    12·2 answers
  • What's 9 in index form
    9·2 answers
  • Please answer ASAP i need this immediately
    11·2 answers
  • Answer ?? It’s multiplicity
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!