Answer:
poverty concentration effect.
Explanation:
According to my research on different economic class families, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this phenomenon results in a poverty concentration effect. This effect refers to a spatial density of socio-economic deprivation which can have effects on surrounding neighborhoods that are not classified as "high-poverty," and therefore almost eliminating overall economic potential for the people.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although it seems that something is missing in your question, such as more context or reference, we can comment on the following
John Hancock and Samuel Adams took the colonists to participate in the Revolutionary movement against the aggressions and injustices of the English crown. However, they had different approaches. Samuel Adams was a propagandist and liked to organize riots, mob acts to show colonists opposition to the English king.
On the other hand, John Hanc*ck was more of a diplomat, as the businessman he was.
Both Patriots had to hide for a while in Lexington because the British troops were after them due to their insurrection activities. Indeed, the English wanted to hang Adams and Hancock as traitors.
Answer: the answer is below
Explanation: the ideational theory of is like what does the person mean or what he or she has done for something or someone
Answer:
oh its letting me answer now cool, well anyways as you probably already saw in the comments, when a bowler makes three strikes in a row its called a Turkey
Explanation:
i know because i use to go bowling with my uncle a few times
Answer:
authoritarian
Explanation:
Authoritarian regime: The term authoritarian regime is defined as a phenomenon in which an individual who is considered as a ruling authority is supposed to maintain power via a combination of different appeals towards a traditional legitimacy, repression and patron-client ties, that is being carried out through a bound consisting the ruling person or the authority by personal loyalties.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the authoritarian regime.
