Were did John Hancok and Samuel Adams take the colonist

Social Studies

1 answer:

n200080 [17]2 years ago

4 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although it seems that something is missing in your question, such as more context or reference, we can comment on the following

John Hancock and Samuel Adams took the colonists to participate in the Revolutionary movement against the aggressions and injustices of the English crown. However, they had different approaches. Samuel Adams was a propagandist and liked to organize riots, mob acts to show colonists opposition to the English king.

On the other hand, John Hanc*ck was more of a diplomat, as the businessman he was.

Both Patriots had to hide for a while in Lexington because the British troops were after them due to their insurrection activities. Indeed, the English wanted to hang Adams and Hancock as traitors.

You might be interested in

Albert suffers from narcissistic personality disorder. His therapist says that his problem is due to a lack of parental empathy

HACTEHA [7]

The answer would be A.) Kohut. According to Kohut's self psychology model, narcissistic personality disorder originates from lack of parental empathy.

6 0

3 years ago

What power is Hitler going to destroy in the east because they go against Fascism?

Mkey [24]

Answer: A. Britain

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Which organization maintains and manages national-level preparedness standards? Homeland Security Interagency Coordination Group

kupik [55]

The National Security Council is the organization that maintains and manages national-level preparedness standards. This is used by the President of the United States for assistance and advice in making national security a priority and also during decision-making for foreign policies.

4 0

3 years ago

What were some reasons why Americans feared immigrants?

zvonat [6]

Answer:The Catalyst asked a variety of contributors to address the anxiety that surrounds the nation’s protracted immigration debate. We specifically asked people with differing opinions and backgrounds to answer this question since it’s hard to resolve any debate without knowing the contrasting views. That’s why we have invited immigrants and non-immigrants, national and local figures, religious and political leaders, writers and policymakers to take on this volatile topic.

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Should Congress have the power to interpret the Constitution? Write a paragraph which you argue for or against the wide applicat

Stells [14]

Answer:

No i do not think that the congress should interpret the constitution because there would be changes in it. There would be less rights to the citizens and taking freedom away from the citizens of the united states of america. Knowing this the citizens would revolt violently causing mass destruction.

Explanation:

brainlest

3 0

3 years ago