Considering the situation, and based on the laws end regulation codes established by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, IRB has the authority to approve research involving pregnant women.
IRB, an acronym for Institutional review board, under Subpart B, Section 46.203, stated that IRB has the jurisdiction to determine whether to approve research involving a pregnant woman.
Also, under Section 46.204, subsection D., IRB can approve this case whereby a research study is greater than minimal risk with no potential direct benefit to subjects. The study includes pregnant women.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is, Yes, IRB can approve such research.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/8905808
Answer:
The Constitution enumerates a great many powers of Congress, ranging from seemingly major powers, such as the powers to regulate interstate and foreign commerce, to seemingly more minor powers, such as the power to establish post offices and post roads. But there are many powers that most people, today or in 1788 (when the Constitution was ratified), would expect Congress to exercise that are not part of those enumerations. The Constitution assumes that there will be federal departments, offices, and officers, but no clause expressly gives Congress power to create them. Congress is given specific power to punish counterfeiting and piracy, but there is no explicit general authorization to provide criminal—or civil – penalties for violating federal law. Several constitutional provisions give Congress substantial authority over the nation’s finances, but no clause discusses a national bank or federal corporations.
According to the theory of <span>Testa and Livingston (1999), women who have been drinking are more likely to take risks they would not take in normal situations because they're brain ceases to find easy risk-free solutions to otherwise standard situations. They are thus more prone to engage in risky behavior such as accepting a ride from a stranger.</span>
Answer:
Concrete operational stage
Explanation:
The concrete operational stage is the third stage of Piaget's theory of cognitive development, predating the formal operational stage (12 and above) and arriving after the preoperational stage (2-7 years old). During this stage, children are able to make logical conclusions in terms of the things they can experience with their senses. Some examples would be noticing that rain comes down from the sky, which is a form of inductive thinking.
However, children at this age group are not yet able to think in a more abstract manner - which is why their deductive thinking abilities are not yet as well-refined as its inductive thinking ones.
What are "the following" tho?
