Answer:
protection profiles.
Explanation:
Common Criteria can be defined as an international set of guidelines and specifications which are designed and developed for the evaluation of an information security product, in order to ensure that they meet an agreed-upon and specific security standard for general use by the public. It comprises of two (2) key components: Evaluation assurance level and protection profiles.
In the Common Criteria, the common set of functional and assurance requirements for a category of vendor products deployed in a particular type of environment are known as protection profiles.
Answer:
Convertible bonds
Explanation:
One advantege of convertible bonds for the issuer is that bondholders are willing to accept a loxer interest rate because they have an option of converting their bonds to common stock.
If a company wants to issue bonds at an interest rate that is lower than the current market interest rate, they should offer convertible bonds.
<h2>Answer</h2>
Buy on Credit
<h3>Explanation</h3>
When in a liquidity problem and items have to be bought, buying on credit seems to be the best option. Buying on credit allows immediate ownership of required items whereas the money can be paid later as per the credit policy and terms. This permits the consumer to take the advantage of item ownership with delayed payment hence double advantage.
Answer:
It belongs to Alma because Susan abandoned it and Alma took possession of it
Explanation:
By common law, Alma is a person who has found an abandoned property and she may claim it. To do this, she has to take some definite steps to show her claim. Alma can claim this abandoned piece of chair by taking it into her house, or by placing a sign on it to show that she now owns it.
If Susan was to take this to court, the court would determine the kind of item and where it was found to determine if Alma has a right to it. But since it was found in a dump site she now has the right to it.
Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.
