1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dolphi86 [110]
3 years ago
15

What led to the end of the Cold War?

History
1 answer:
taurus [48]3 years ago
5 0
The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and breakup if Soviet Union in 1991
You might be interested in
Panuto: Tukuyin ang Dinastiya sa China, Korea
morpeh [17]

Answer:

answer is great wall of china

8 0
3 years ago
٢- من حاكم الكويت أثناء غزو العراق للكويت؟ وما لقبه الذي اشتهر به؟​
likoan [24]

Answer:Sadam Huseín Abdulmayid al Tikriti (en árabe, صدام حسين عبد المجيد التكريتي‎; Tikrit, 28 de abril de 1937- Bagdad, 30 de diciembre de 2006) fue un político y dictador iraquí, presidente de su país entre 1979 y 2003.

Explanation:poques esta en gugle

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the excerpt from Herbert Hoover’s “Rugged Individualism” speech, delivered on October 22, 1928. Choose two highlighted exam
Rashid [163]

All highlighted examples show how Herbert Hoover (1874-1964) believed that once the federal government started to take directly participate in the economic system the inevitable outcome would be the loss of freedom.

In the first and second examples he is saying that once the government starts to take part, it goes all the way into the private lives of individuals which would be an attack against the basis of freedom.

Hoover thought like this because for him freedom only exists in the private life when it's kept away and separate from the government.

The third and fourth examples have the same meaning as the priors only now he is talking specifically about economics. He believed the problem of the Great Depression should be figured out by private businesses and the government should only cushion the situation.

4 0
4 years ago
The Roman Army was staffed by professional, career soldiers. Do you believe that this gave the Romans a military advantage? Expl
solong [7]

The success of the Roman army was based around the facts that it had excellent organization, great leadership, good training, good equipment, and that is was only consisted of professionals.

The Roman army had only professional soldiers in it. Not everyone was able to become soldiers, as certain physical criteria had to be fulfilled. The ones that became soldiers had training everyday. Tactical training, one to one combat, formation combat etc.

That led to the Roman army to be very successful in its military campaigns, especially because very often it was coming upon poorly organized armies, where most of the soldiers were either part-time soldiers, or just ordinary villagers.

4 0
3 years ago
What would not be a reason for the U.S. entering war 1
Bas_tet [7]
I’m gonna search and check rite now
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following ideas from the Roman Republic is also used in the United States
    6·2 answers
  • Which were the two southern states with the largest number of African Americans serving in state government during Reconstructio
    6·2 answers
  • Which one came closer, racial or<br> gender equality?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the Church use the changing politics of Europe to increase its influence?
    11·1 answer
  • Which views did the Federalists favor?
    14·2 answers
  • What happens in a society that does not have the rule of law?
    14·2 answers
  • Explain how ida b wells respond to the question of race relations
    11·1 answer
  • Do not have the authority to deal directly with bills or to propose legislation to Congress
    12·1 answer
  • What did the “Know-Nothings” think about the German and Irish immigrants?
    7·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP IM TIMED
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!