Answer:
wages cannot adjust downward quickly and easily.
Explanation:
In a situation where the macroeconomy is experiencing a higher than the natural rate of unemployment, it must be because "wages cannot adjust downward quickly and easily."
Given that wages are arguably the most significant aspect to entice employees or people to work and get paid. Hence, where the wages are not enough to cause for the employees, there tends to be a situation where wages cannot adjust downward quickly and easily. And therefore, people would not want to work where there is low pay, and eventually, unemployment increases.
Answer:
The differences between US GAAP and IFRS pose an extra cost because international corporations must prepare two separate accounting statements. But besides that, other potential risks include paying higher taxes than what the companies should pay int their home countries and the uncertainty generated by changing rules.
Not only do current tax rates affect potential investments, e.g. currently companies in the US pay relatively low corporate taxes (Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017) but these benefits end on 2025. But also different methods for valuating physical assets and R&D costs can represent higher than expected taxes. E.g. depending on a company's needs, it may be beneficial to expense all R&D costs right away, or maybe it would be better to capitalize some of them after technical feasibility is achieved (IFRS).
The main advantage of having uniform rules (e.g. UCC) is that all the companies know exactly what to expect and how to act. Certainty decreases risk, and less risk reduces costs.
Explanation:
In the US, the vast majority of firms use US GAAP as their accounting method, but around the world the IFRS method is used.
Physical asset valuation is the process of determining the value of your physical assets including P, P & E, and also inventories.
- When valuing inventories IFRS uses FIFO, while US GAAP allows FIFO, LIFO or weighted average costing methods. US GAAP also values inventory at lesser of cost or market value, while IFRS values inventory at lesser of cost or net realizable value.
- US GAAP uses the cost method to determine the historic cost of an asset, while IFRS uses basically the same method but does not include all the costs of location of the assets (e.g. cost of removing or clearing a facility).
- US GAAP recognizes non-monetary exchanges while IFRS doesn't.
- IFRS also allows the cost of asset to be revalued, which can result in unrealized gains or losses. The US GAAP only considers historic costs.
- There are also other minor differences regarding depreciation, disposals and impairment rules.
Research and development must be expensed right away under US GAAP, while IFRS basically requires the same, it allows some capitalization of development expenditures if certain criteria is met (technical feasibility is achieved).
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question we can say that Yes, the dealership is contractually bound to sell Mike the car at that price. This is assuming that the ad handed to the dealership by Mike is an actual ad that was designed and published by the dealership. If this is the case the dealership must uphold their price or it will be considered false advertisement and Mike would have a basis on which to sue the business.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
For the cost of goods sold, the company made around $42,435
Explanation:
Solve cost of goods for Jan. 1st:
2000 units × $8
$16,000
Solve for cost of goods during 2007:
5000 units × $10
$50,000
Use the formula for weighted-average cost:
WAC per unit = cost of goods available for sale / units available for sale
WAC per unit = 16,000 + 50,000 / 2000 + 5000
WAC per unit = 66,000 / 7000
WAC per unit = 9.42857..... I will round to a dollar value
WAC per unit = 9.43
For cost of goods <em>sold</em>:
4,500 × 9.43 (please keep in mind 9.43 is a rounded number)
$42,435
Answer:
Comer's tax liability for 2018 = $33300
Explanation:
Before determining Comer's tax liability for 2018, we need to understand what gross income is and what forms part of gross income. Gross income is total amount of income from various sources minus/plus and additions and deductions. Income from salary is earned in the ordinary course of work/business which is definitely part of gross income. Capital gain is refers to gain/profit/income from sale of capital assets such as property, shares, stocks, piece of land. Any gains and losses form part of gross income and capital losses are reported as deductions meant to reduce investors tax liability just as capital gains should be taxed.
Lets first calculate gross income and then apply tax rate to determine tax liability.
Gross income = salary + Short-term & long-term capital gains - short-term & long-term capital losses
GI = $64000 + $31000 + $9000+$15000 -$2000 -$6000
GI = $111000
Assuming the tax rate is 30%, the tax liability for the year is as follows:
Tax liability = $111000×30%
Tax liability = $33300
