Answer:
The Scientific Revolution changed the ways of thinking because it changed the way we understood about the things around us, such as outer space, the enviroment, etc.
Explanation:
I feel that Hamilton's statements has some threshold, in reflection, to today's modern society. I believe that with the many diverse opinions, it seems as if it has weakened us a little more. Lets take for example, the TPP agreement, this stirred many controversy between the rich and the middle classed folks. It was like clashing between Left and Right wing...But that depends on your stance. Another example would be Trump's idea of building a wall. That idea may still be a thought, but the idea of actually building a wall to divide America and Mexico, stirred a lot of hate, and yet a lot of support from the general public. And there were even some who were in between. But regardless, the statement really depends on how clean (or non-biased) your eye lenses are.
I hope you understood that. Have any doubts, please say so. Chur! :)<span />
In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
Answer:
The answer is:
Georgia's first constitutional convention met and produced the state's inaugural constitution, known as the Constitution of 1777. Several other states also chose the convention method as a means of adopting new constitutions
There were some issues regarding these different methods like the legitimacy of the constitution-making process
Explanation:
The government they established was a confederation, a loose organization of states where the power remained in the individual states with the central government remaining weak. The government was composed of a Confederation Congress with limited powers. It had no executive or judicial branches and no power to tax or to regulate trade.
State law was supreme, problems with war debts, trade, and diplomacy spurred many of the new country’s leaders to call for a revision of the Articles of Confederation to give the central government more power to deal with these problems.
