In By Any Other Name, the author tries to show the tension and discrimination she and he sister face in an Anglo-Indian school.
- During the colonial rule, the British setup schools based on the British curriculum in India, with education taught in English.
- In By Any Other Name, the author describes the tension between the Indian and British people.
- The conflict began when Premila examine the behaviours of British teachers towards them. She changed her point of view on British culture when a conflict between her and her teacher occurred in school.
- Premila was bothered that her teacher made her and other Indian classmates sit at the back of the room, separated by everyone else, and declared that Indians tend to cheat.
- Premila changed her perspective on British culture from positive to negative when her teacher putting a sarcastic cultural stereotype on her.
- Multiculturalism became one of the main themes in the memoir as it describes the cultural diversity from different countries and cultural backgrounds that come together in one place.
Therefore, we can conclude that the story the author portrayed in the memoir the British in India indicates the objection from Indians because of the absence of culture in school.
Learn more about "By Any Other Name" here:
brainly.com/question/2285492
I am pretty sure the correct answer to this question your looking for would be: C.a static character whose beliefs and behaviors don't change over the course of the story. I hope i helped! :)
i just tried to look her up it must mean her account is blocked or deleted
Answer:
They are obedient, they know or when not to do something such as going to the bathroom, they understand common things such as fetch sit stand or stay, and they know how to walk on a leash
Explanation:
Answer + Explanation:
The speeches that Brutus and Mark Antony deliver differ in several ways. However, one of the most important differences they exhibit is the way in which each speaker addresses the audience.
In the case of <u>Brutus</u>, he decides to appeal to his audience's minds. He speaks in a somewhat impersonal way that suggests that he does not understand the audience deeply. Moreover, his description of the motives of the plot is dry, and it underestimates the connection that the audience felt to Julius Caesar.
On the other hand, <u>Mark Antony</u> seems to understand the crowd better. He uses emotional words that create a more personal relationship. He also focuses on the importance that Julius Caesar had for the audience. This creates a more successful and dramatic speech.
