1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NeX [460]
3 years ago
9

So which one is a pathos

History
2 answers:
Dahasolnce [82]3 years ago
8 0
Because pathos evokes emotion, the best answer is A because it make you feel bad for the author
Liula [17]3 years ago
4 0
Pathos is the appeal to emotion, it convinces an audience of an argument through emotional response. So you would need to chose the answer with the most emotion that persuades an audience.
A. would probably be your best answer because the author is showing emotion to the audience to persuade them into getting better food.
You might be interested in
Which of the following best describes "moral diplomacy"?
daser333 [38]

Answer:

I need the following. The answer choices

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0
3 years ago
Dutch humanist whose "in Praise of Folly" teased different people in society
igomit [66]

Answer:

Desiderius Erasmus

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
REPOSING! <br><br>What are the challenges of human interactions?
Studentka2010 [4]
Human-Technology Symbiosis; Human-Environment Interactions; Ethics, Privacy and Security; Well-being, Health and Eudaimonia; Accessibility and Universal Access; Learning and Creativity; and Social Organization and Democracy.
6 0
2 years ago
Please helpppp!
Gekata [30.6K]
The answer is going to be c
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which country suffered the most casualties in world war i?
    14·1 answer
  • How were American Indian able to adapt to their environment
    5·1 answer
  • Where did Columbus first land in the new world?
    9·2 answers
  • Why did the estate system lead to revolution?
    12·1 answer
  • Types of members of American Federation of labor
    6·1 answer
  • In England, people associate the acceptance of their Bill of Rights with the reign of
    5·1 answer
  • Southern plantation owners invested heavily in early United States industry.<br> True<br> False
    5·2 answers
  • How did President James Buchanan decide to handle South Carolina’s secession? a)He sent federal troops to secure the state from
    8·2 answers
  • During World War II, the Indian National Congress told citizens to
    11·2 answers
  • I will mark brainless plz answer this which one is it
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!