How did the Compromise of 1877 effectively end Reconstruction?

2 answers:

4 0

The Compromise of 1877 was a purported informal, unwritten deal that settled the intensely disputed 1876 U.S. presidential election. It resulted in the United States federal government pulling the last troops out of the South, and formally ended the Reconstruction Era.

dedylja [7]3 years ago

4 0

The compromise of 1877 ended reconstruction by pulling Hayes pulling troops out of the south. This ended a brief period of prosperity for African Americans and allowed white landowners to begin crop sharing. The Jim Crow laws began and the African Americans no longer had the rights they so shortly had

You might be interested in

The fighting between fugitive slaves and slave catchers led to "bleeding Kansas" true or false

9966 [12]

The answer is true :)

4 0

2 years ago

How come Serbia was upset that Austria acquired Bosnia?

Paha777 [63]

Answer:

By article 25 of the Treaty of Berlin, 1878, Austria-Hungary was permitted to occupy and administer Bosnia and Herzegovina. The crisis in 1908-1909 sprang from the fact that Serbia believed that she must prevent the consummation of annexation by Austria-Hungary or give up permanently her long-cherished hopes.

5 0

2 years ago

True statements about prince Henry's school of navigation

scoundrel [369]

It employed the best map makers available.

On-the-job training was accomplished on successive trips down the coast of Africa.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Karl marx was an avowed atheist who characterized religion as "the opium of the people."

Dimas [21]

Karl Marx was an Avowed Atheist who Characterized religion Is:
~True.

Hope this helps.

5 0

2 years ago

What concerns did colonists have related to representation in Parliament?

stich3 [128]

Answer And Explanation: No taxation without representation" is a slogan originating during the 1700s that summarized one of 27 colonial grievances of the American colonists in the Thirteen Colonies, which was one of the major causes of the American Revolution. In short, many in those colonies believed that, as they were not directly represented in the distant British Parliament, any laws it passed affecting the colonists (such as the Sugar Act and the Stamp Act) were illegal under the Bill of Rights 1689, and were a denial of their rights as Englishmen.

HOPE THIS HELPS PLS MARK BRAINLIEST

4 0

2 years ago