It is important to understand that the construction of identities, when analyzed in contemporary times, must be viewed from two dimensions: “Conflicting diversity within the nation-state (regions, ethnic issues, etc.) and the emergence of transnational identity references. For example, the world of consumption. Different social groups can thus appropriate globalized symbolic references (from Madonna to hip-hop) to construct their own image, their “identity”. There is, therefore, a situation within which different "identities" complement or enter into dispute. The monopoly that the state had (or thought it had) collapsed. The construction of national identity must now be done in a context of diversification that previously did not exist, technological transformations are obviously important, but one should not fall into a reductionist temptation that gives technologies a transformative capacity that they do not possess. The world will no longer be democratic because the technologies we have are more sophisticated. Today there is a certain technological panacea that often deludes us. Social problems will not be solved with 'more technology' or 'less'.
Egyptian art mainly describes architecture, crafts, literature, music and mainly, was closely linked to religion, so it was fairly standardized, not margins to creativity or personal imagination, because the work should reveal a perfect command of techniques and not the style of the artist.
The biggest difference of the art that we see today is the freedom that the present artists have in representing their art, something that was not common at that time. At that time the artists had to follow the artistic pattern.
<span>easy The digit-span test hope it hellped
</span>
