Living in a way that allows people to meet present needs, without compromising the ability of future generations to do the same, is known as sustainability.
<h3>
What is sustainability ?</h3>
Sustainability is a social ideal that, in general, seeks for long-term human coexistence on Earth in safety. Since there is no universally accepted definition of sustainability, there are many different ones in the literature and over time. Meeting our needs today without sacrificing the potential of future generations to do the same is what is meant by sustainability. Along with natural resources, we also require economic and social resources. Sustainability goes beyond environmental concerns.
<h3>
What makes a lifestyle sustainable?</h3>
Living sustainably is a practical attitude that attempts to lessen societal and individual environmental impact by implementing actions to combat climate change and other serious environmental issues. Living sustainably is, to put it another way, a way of lessening one's "carbon footprint".
To know more about carbon footprint visit :
brainly.com/question/1270740
#SPJ4
Religious minorities were treated as second-rate beings by the Ottoman and Safavid empires. The Janissary system used Christians as the Sultan's bodyguards. The rivalry between Sunni and Shia Muslims was related to who would succeed the Prophet Muhammad.
<h3>What was the Janissary system?</h3>
- It was a system formed by several armies.
- It was the system formed by the elite army of the Ottoman sultans.
- It was the army used to fight Christians.
- This system led Christians who refused to convert to Islam as the sultan's slaves and bodyguards.
In the Ottoman and Safavid empires, religious minorities were seen as unfit for society. The sultans of these empires forced the people of the conquered areas to adopt the sultan's religion, Islam. Those who refused would be seen as inferior beings and therefore would be enslaved.
These empires witnessed disputes between Shia and Sunni Muslims. These disputes were based on the dispute over who would succeed the Prophet Muhammad. For the Shias, succession should take place within the descendants of the prophet, but for the Sunnis, the people should elect a successor.
Learn more about the Ottoman and Safavid empires:
brainly.com/question/26501400
#SPJ1
1. True
Existentialism refers to the philosophy that associated with the principles that all human beings should be free to control their thought, will, and actions. Modernist writers believe that only such freedoms could enable people to fully expressed their idea and creativity to fully influence needed changes in our personal life and society where we live in.
2. False
the prefix ambi- means both ways.
For example, extrovert refers to the people who prefers to interact with a lot of people (such as partying, becoming center of attention, etc). Introverts refers to the people who prefers to spend their time alone (reading books or experimenting)
Ambiverts refers the people who can be extroverts or introverts at time.
3. True
For example, pay attention to these two sentences.
- Timothy<em> take</em> Cheryl to the wedding. (1.)
- Timothy <em>was taken </em>by Cheryl to the wedding. (2)/principle
In the first sentence, the word 'take' act as a verb and can be interpreted as Timothy who is the one that take Cheryl to the wedding.
In second sentence, the word 'take' act as an adjective, and can be interpreted as Cheryl who is the one that take Timothy to the wedding.
President Andrew Jackson reason to remove the Native Americans because he wants the land for settlers to settle in and he didn't want the Native Americans to bother them and he anted the to leave but they wouldn't buge so the law stated they had to be forced and walk to what is now present-day Oklahoma Hope this helps:)
Answer:
If prithviraj had killed ghori in the first battle, there would be no need for a second battle where prithviraj would be defeated.
Explanation:
Although Prithviraj emerged victorious in the first battle, he proved to be an extremely arrogant and superb character, allowing Ghori to stay alive, even though he knew it could have dire consequences. This decision by Prithviraj was senseless and caused the need for a second battle where he was defeated, also because of his arrogance, allowing Ghori to continue his plans.
