Most historians would say yes. Hoover was famously "hands off" in terms of helping America get through very hard economic times. FDR, was the opposite--he was very proactive.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C (Efficiency and fairness).
Explanation:
- In many disciplines across the social sciences, the concept of a trade-off between equality and efficiency and is pervasive. Also, an inaccurate notion of that well-known dilemma is indeed an essential part of politicians and policy-makers discourse.
- Philosophical experiments of the concept have indeed deflated the theoretical unity of most of its iterations, whereas the existing literature attempting to test the empirical relationship between equality and growth showed conflicting results.
- However, the scientific status of the notion of a trade-off between equality and efficiency is a matter of discussion.
Therefore, Option C is the right answer.
1. Employers can take advantage of the minimum wage and just pay employees the least possible amount
I believe globalization is your answer!
If this was the appropiate answer make sure to mark as the brainliest!
-procklown
There are some advantages of social norms.
1-Historical values are promoted
2-People may be kept under control
3-May increase the level of kindness in a society
4-People may feel more secure
5-You may stop bad habits
6-May help you to find new friends
7-Necessary to be a valuable member of society
8-Complying with social norms makes your parents proud
9-People know how the game works
10-Social norms may keep the current system working
11-Conformity to social norms can give you a career boost