Answer:
Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. ... Wikipedia generally uses reliable secondary sources, which vet data from primary sources.
Explanation:
Wikipedia is ideal in these situations because it will allow you to find the information, as well as sources which you can research to confirm that information. In any case, you should not cite Wikipedia itself, but the source provided; you should certainly look up the source yourself before citing it.
Why is Wikipedia a good place to begin?
While the wisdom of the crowd doesn't always rule when it comes to objective, fact-based research and writing (unless you're writing a report on Wookies), Wikipedia offers a good way to get your head around a topic and to start narrowing down your research focus so that you can switch to using more commonly accepted .\
Answer:Yes He is been discriminated on
Explanation: Believe that if we are co-workers working in a place together and drinking together, there should be a level of friendship involved. For a level of friendship involved that warrant us drinking together, will still enable his co-staff to accept him for for who he is. Most of his fellow staff can be drunkards, some even womanizers. Why then are they accepted and He is not. I believe they are hypocrite and he should not be friends or even drink with them. If they want his hand of friendship, then they should allow him to be able to show his partner without being discriminated or looked down on.
Answer:
the final stage or publishing stage
Explanation:
hope this helps u
can u mark me as brainliest pls
Do i agree with the ideas presented?
do i think the writing is interesting?
do i like the essay?
do i see that the writer tried to add style to the essay
do i notice that the writer tries to engage readers?