The author emphasized on the politeness as it serves as a social commentary to show how focusing on formalities can be unproductive and Option B is correct.
<h3>What is social commentary?</h3>
Social commentary is nothing but creating awareness among the general public about the issues of the society by informing them through rhetorical acts about the issues.
In the excerpt "how the animals lost their tails and got them back traveling from Philadelphia to medicine hat." the author has focused on the politeness and formalities and explained how focusing on the formalities can turn unproductive in social commentary.
Therefore, the author emphasized on the politeness as it serves as a social commentary to show how focusing on formalities can be unproductive and Option B is correct.
Learn more about Social commentary here:
brainly.com/question/1628321
The correct answer is: A- He uses the words “contaminated” and “evacuated” to express his seriousness about the danger.
I believe it would be to convince the audience of a certain viewpoint.
I'm going to say just the word "no." I know Spanish and English -
Spanish has upside down question/exclamation marks, and they don't use capitalized letters unless it's the beginning of a sentence, which marks out vocabulary.
Spanish is also nearly backwards from English - this marking out pattern of word order.
It is appreciated
Explanation:
-Nonverbal communication isn't precise at least 65% of the time (Not in terms of sign language)
-Nonverbal communication is not easy at all it can be actually quite difficult to understand (Unless you have an establishment of basic movements to replace certain terms. For example, one finger up means "I need a new pencil" [Referring to a school setting] )
-Nonverbal communication is most certainly not necessary, especially if you have the authorization and the capability to talk
-Nonverbal communication most definitely can be appreciated in certain environments (i.e. School, library, etc.)
