The Romans brought the benefits of Roman civilization and culture to conquered territories,and thus assimilated their populations (at least,those that hadn't been killed or enslaved during the conquest) into the empire as a whole.
The purpose of this was to win conquered peoples over to the Roman way of life - a higher and more advanced standard of living would reconcile them to Roman rule.
Sometimes though there would be serious revolts against Roman rule - one in Britain and 2 in Judea were the most serious,so this policy didn't necessarily work everywhere all of the time.
MARK ME BRAINLIEST PLEASE!!!!!
In what way controlling it or making sure that propagandas don't lie
In this quotation Winston Churchill is expressing reproach with the use of the word dishonor in regards to whoever he believes acted dishonorably. The word reproach means to address someone in a way that expresses disapproval or disappointment (in this case it is disappointment or disapproval in the other parties actions which he has labeled "dishonorable."
Yes.
Although the constitution does not mention the issue of secession, The Supreme Court has consistently interpreted the Constitution to be an "indestructible" union. The states cannot leave the Union. There is no legal basis a state can point to for unilaterally seceding.
You would probalby get in trouble.
