Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
Eliminating the options one after the other;
Option A: Economic Feasibility, involves the study of the cost and statistical understanding of the effect such project would have on the economy. this does not conforms with the issues such as political repercussions as stated in the question above, option A is not the best fit.
Option B: Operational Feasibility, involves a study of how well the operation of such project will be of usefulness or how well would it solve the problem, also this does not relate to the question above.
Option D: This option is best fit to the gap above in the question, because is a test to see if it will conform to requirements, so that it does come back as a crime against the law. it relates to the question above, as it involves political understanding and law such as the information privacy Act, that is why it is the best fit to the above question.
Option D: Technical Feasibility only examines or is carried out to see if the technical functionality will match the requirement needed.
Answer:
A marketing strategy
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the teenager in this scenario has so far developed a marketing strategy. This refers to a strategy which describes all the information detailing the company's overall game plan that will be used in order to attract consumers and turn them into customers in order to achieve the desired company profit.
The answer is B run for federal office
True
Culture lag refers to the phenomenon where a culture has not yet caught up to speed with technological advances and new material culture in society. Cultural lag occurs because <span>advances in technology and new material changes in society take place faster than changes in practices, norms and beliefs required to adjust to these changes and developments. Due to cultural lags, individuals experience some level of conflict and discomfort. An example of a cultural lag is when "selfies" first became popular- many were against it and uncomfortable due to it. </span>
Answer:
A: Those courts can nevertheless have jurisdiction if the act produces effects within the home country.
Explanation:
The objective theory of jurisdiction is designed to guarantee U.S. sovereignty over its citizens (or firms) abroad. Any act of its citizens or firms abroad is likely to have some sort of effect within the home country.
