Negation of all owls fly?

2 answers:

8 0

Looking at this in terms of sets, let's call O the set of all owls, and F the set of all things that can fly. What this original statement is saying every animal that's a member of the set of all owls is also a member of the set of all things that can fly, or in other words, O⊂F (O is a subset of F). Negating this tells us that, while there's at least one element of O that also belongs to F, O is not contained entirely in F (O⊆F, in notation), so a good negation or our original statement might be:

Not all owls can fly.

Ratling [72]3 years ago

6 0

...wow the other person was fantastic.. I’m not even gonna try competing...

You might be interested in

Radical exponent definition

kaheart [24]

Answer:

a fractional exponent in which the numerator of the fractional exponent is the power of the base and the denominator of the fractional exponent is the index of the radical.

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

1 year ago

Which quadrant does the point (-3, 6) lie in? Quadrant IV Quadrant I Quadrant II

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

It should be in Quadrant II! <3

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

X-20 +(30-9)=29 What is x if it is >100

jasenka [17]

X=28
It is simple just do percentases and then all the outside stuff