Answer:
1) Implied consent
2) There is no effect of the consent on the physician/organisation because the patient was unconscious.
Explanation:
1) The type of consent that can be applied to this scenario is called implied consent.
2) In such an emergency situation the consent of an unconscious patient or a patient that is unable to communicate presumed to give his/her consent if they were able to. Since the patient came into the ER it would be assumed that she came to the hospital for treatment and would have given her consent if she was conscious. I don’t think that any consequences for such an action. The Doctor only carried out the procedure due to the fact that it was a life or death situation for both the mother and the baby.
Answer:
the person doesnt know its them
Explanation:
Answer:
I hope the below helps!
Explanation:
For the person infected, they may not be able to carry out things they normally do in their day to day life. For family or near by friends, this could cause a big impact on them as they may need to start helping with jobs (e.g. buying food, administering medicine etc).
If the disease is infectious, there is also risk of spreading the disease to people who make contact. It depends on the type of disease as to how it is spread, but this can cause close people to become ill.
When diseased, some people can become seriously poorly. This puts stress onto family and others as they care/love for the person infected. If this stress is not handled properly, it can develop into sleep deprivation, anxiety, depression etc.
The cheetah will run half the fast it ran for example if it runs 70 mph the fastest then it will run 35, almost like a ostrich