<span>20% is the maximum speed up possible for this program.
For this problem, let's assign the time of 1 for the task when using a single processor. Now let's assume that we have an infinite number of processors available to handle the portion of the program that can be executed in parallel so that the execution time for that portion will be 0. That means that the total execution time with an infinite number of processors will be
1 * (0.80 + 0) = 1 * 0.80 = 0.80
So at best, the parallel program will take 80% of the time for the single threaded version. So the speed increase will be
(1 - 0.80) / 1 = 0.20/1 = 0.20 = 20%</span>
Monopolistically competitive firms (A) cannot influence the market price by virtue of their size alone while monopolies and oligopolies can.
<h3>
What is a monopoly?</h3>
- A monopoly occurs when there is a single seller in the market.
- The monopoly case is considered the polar opposite of perfect competition in conventional economic theory.
- The demand curve facing the monopolist is, by definition, the industry demand curve, which is downward sloping.
<h3>What is
oligopoly?</h3>
- Oligopolistic markets are characterized by a small number of suppliers.
- They can be found in all nations and in a wide range of industries.
- Some oligopoly markets are very competitive, whereas others are substantially less so, or appear to be.
Monopolistically competitive enterprises, unlike monopolies and oligopolies, cannot influence market prices only through their size.
Therefore, monopolistically competitive firms (A) cannot influence the market price by virtue of their size alone while monopolies and oligopolies can.
Know more about monopoly here:
brainly.com/question/13113415
#SPJ4
Correct question:
The feature that differentiates monopolistic competition from monopolies and oligopolies is that monopolistically competitive firms.
(A) cannot influence the market price by virtue of their size alone.
(B) are price takers.
(C) do not have a price as a decision variable.
(D) benefit from barriers to entry.
Answer:
Hope it helps
Mark my answer brainliest
Answer: Option (b) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Revenues = $300,000
Merchandise it purchased = $75,000
Salaries paid = $14,000
Owners invested = $23,000
Borrowed on a five-year note = $23,000
Interest paid = $3,000
Paid for a two-year insurance policy = $6,800
Income tax rate = 9%
Gross Margin = Revenues - Cost of Goods Sold
= $300,000 - $75,000
= $225,000
Profit before tax = Gross Margin - Salaries - Insurance payment - Interest
= $225,000 - 14,000 - 3,400 - 3,000
= $204,600
Net Income = Profit before tax - Tax at 9%
= $204,600 - 18,414
= $186,186
Answer:
equivalent annual cost: 19,784.81
The investment is not economically justified as it is cheaper to pay the fines than invest in the equipment to avoid them.
Explanation:
We calcualte the PMT of a 75,000 dollars equipment at 10%
PV 75,000
time 5
rate 0.1
C $ 19,784.811
EPA fines: <u> </u><u>$ 18,500.00 </u>
differential: (1, 284.81)
