The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": analyzing potential mergers.
Explanation:
Operations managers are those in charge of planning, studying, and analyzing all the steps regarding the processes of production of a company. They supervise if the companies have enough raw materials for manufacturing, organize the labor responsible for the production, and evaluate any problem born because of the operational activities of the business.
<em>Analyzing potential mergers is an event likely to be evaluated by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of a firm along with the Board of Directors</em>.
Answer:
Sell pound forward
Explanation:
Forward rate = $1.51 *(1+2.65%) = 1.51 * 1.0265 = 1.55
Amount receivable in case of forward hedge = 100,000 * 1.55 = 155,000
Premium payable on put options = 100,000 * 0.3 = 3,000
Amount receivable in put options = 100,000 * 1.54 = 154,000
Net receivables in put options = 154,000 - 3,000 = 151,000
Conclusion: Higher amount is available in case of forward hedge. So, sell pound forward