Answer:
Japan's family dynamics have historically been defined by a two-person, female housewife or caregiver role and a male income-earner role, a historically common division of labor between the sexes. After Japan's involvement in World War II ended, the resulting Japanese Constitution included Article 24, "the Gender Equality Clause," which was introduced to steer the country towards gender equality. However, deeply-embedded family and gender norms led to resistance among citizens, and the culture remained largely the same as of 2009.
It was not until the mid-1970s that Japanese women began to play a larger role in the paid economy. Japanese men, however, generally did not step in to play a larger role in the house. Studies have shown that there is a negative correlation between the number of hours worked by fathers in their jobs and the amount of housework (including childcare) that the father provides.After paid work, the father would come home, spending most of his time eating or in non-social interactions such as watching TV with his family.This led to the term "Japan Inc.," synonymous with males committing their life to their job while in a long-term relationship.
Another term that became popular in Japan was the "relationship-less society", describing how men's long work hours left little or no time for them to bond with their families. Japanese society came to be one of isolation within the household, since there was only enough time after work to care for oneself, excluding the rest of the family. This held especially true for families who wished to have a second child. Due to corporations and work regulation laws, men of all ages in large firms are forced to prioritize work over the rest of their life. The limited amount of help from their male spouses leaves women with the majority of household chores.
Explanation:
Basically, they're forced to stay at home, they have huge wage gaps, their health care is way worse than men's. If r*pe is accused, they never believe the women. etc.
Capitalist nations are those who do not have the resources to carry on productive trade agreements
I am pretty sure that the reason whythe USSR adopted atheism as an official state policy is being revealed by the option : <span> to eliminate one potential source of conflict and opposition. Lenin set an aim which would make people believe in ideas followed by communism and he thought that religion could pose as an obstacle for socialism.
</span>Hope it will help you!
