<h3>
Short Answer: Yes, the horizontal shift is represented by the vertical asymptote</h3>
A bit of further explanation:
The parent function is y = 1/x which is a hyperbola that has a vertical asymptote overlapping the y axis perfectly. Its vertical asymptote is x = 0 as we cannot divide by zero. If x = 0 then 1/0 is undefined.
Shifting the function h units to the right (h is some positive number), then we end up with 1/(x-h) and we see that x = h leads to the denominator being zero. So the vertical asymptote is x = h
For example, if we shifted the parent function 2 units to the right then we have 1/x turn into 1/(x-2). The vertical asymptote goes from x = 0 to x = 2. This shows how the vertical asymptote is very closely related to the horizontal shifting.
Keywords:
<em>equation, variable, clear, round, centesima, neperian logarithm, exponential
</em>
For this case we have the following equation 
, from which we must clear the value of the variable "x" and round to the nearest hundredth. To do this, we must apply properties of neperian and exponential logarithms. By definition:
So:
We apply Neperian logarithm to both sides:
We divide between "3" both sides of the equation:
Rounding out the nearest hundredth we have:
Answer:
$3 because you can not round this up to $4 because the order to rounder up you need to have more than $.50
Hello from MrBillDoesMath!
Answer:
a = 2.7
Discussion:
(2/3) ( 6a + 9 ) = 16.8 => the Distributive law
(2/3) (6a) + (2/3)9 = 16.8 =>
4a + 6 = 16.8 => subtract 6 from both sides
4a = 16.8 -6 = 10.8 (divide both sides by 4)
a = 10.8/4
= 2.7
Thank you,
MrB
Part A) 24.79 acres
1) Since that plot has an area of
And the number of units must be between 10 and 10² units.
Part A)
2) Let's convert them to the apparently plausible units, see if it fits within the given interval.
We can see that 0.03 m² does not belong to the given interval.
3) Hence, the answer is 24.79 acres.
